Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:39:49.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Volatility Losses of C14-CDAA from Soil Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. M. Deming
J. M. Deming*
Affiliation:
Biophysics, Monsanto Chemical Company, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis 66, Missouri
Get access

Abstract

An accurate method of determining loss of 2-chloro-N, N-diallylacetamide (CDAA) from soil surfaces was developed. It was found that under some circumstances the volatility response to temperature was reversed to give a decreasing loss with increasing temperature. The volatility-temperature relationship was found to be strongly influenced by the amount of water present on the soil colloid, with increasing amounts of water accelerating CDAA volatility loss. The mechanism for this reaction appears to involve competition between water and CDAA for adsorption sites; however, this factor cannot be differentiated from removal of CDAA from the soil by simple solubilization in water with subsequent steam distillation.

A direct correlation between organic matter content of the soil and resistance of CDAA to evaporation from that soil was shown.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1963 , pp. 91 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Audrick, B. N., and Long, J. V. P. 1952. Measurement of low energy beta emitters by liquid scintillation counting. Research 5:46.Google Scholar
2. Funt, B. L. 1956. Scintillating gels. Nucleonics 14, (8):83.Google Scholar
3. Gantz, R. L., and Slife, F. W. 1957. Soil incorporation of CDAA. Proc. NCWCC 14:42.Google Scholar
4. Hayes, F. N., Rogers, B. S., and Langham, W. H. 1956. Counting suspensions in liquid scintillators. Nucleonics 14(3): 48.Google Scholar
5. Hayes, F. N., Rogers, B. S., and Heibert, R. D., and Schuch, R. L. 1952. Low energy counting with a new liquid-scintillation solute. Science 116:140.Google Scholar
6. Kallman, H. and Furst, M. 1951. Fluorescent liquids for scintillation counters. Nucleonics 8(3):22.Google Scholar
7. Krebs, A. T. 1955. Early history of the scintillation counter. Science 122:17.Google Scholar
8. Otten, R. R., Dawson, J. E. and Schreiber, M. M. 1957. Persistence and leaching of CDEC and CDAA in soil. Proc. NEWCC 11:111.Google Scholar
9. Sheets, T. V. 1959. Effects of soil type and time on the herbicidal activity of CDAA, CDEC, and EPTC. Weeds 7:442.Google Scholar
10. Spurrier, E. C., Bowers, W., Pickard, G. and R. Sief. 1957. A study of spray techniques to increase the effectiveness of various pre-emergence herbicides. Proc. NEWCC 11:27.Google Scholar
11. Switzer, C. M., and Seaton, O. M. 1957. Preliminary studies on the rate of loss of herbicidal activity of several chemicals applied to the soil. Res. Rep. NWCCES:69.Google Scholar
12. Upchurch, R. P. 1959. The effect of soil organic matter on herbicide toxicity under greenhouse conditions. Proc. SWC 12:188.Google Scholar
13. White, C. G., and Helf, S. 1956. Suspension counting in scintillating gels. Nucleonics 14(10):46.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, C. L., and Deming, J. M. 1955. Laboratory and greenhouse evaluations of some new herbicides for grassy weeds, including 2-chloroacetamides and chloroallyl dithiocarbamites. Agron. Abstr.:80.Google Scholar