Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:50:39.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Explanation for the Selective Control of Barnyardgrass in Rice with CIPC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John B. Baker
John B. Baker*
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology Department, Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University, Baton, Rouge, Louisiana
Get access

Extract

Since isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate (CIPC) is being recommended for use on a limited acreage to control barnyardgrass (Echinochloa species) in drilled rice, it was of interest to the author to investigate the mechanism of selectivity involved. Although a difference in sensitivity among graminaceous plants to isopropyl N–phenylcarbamate (IPC) and CIPC has been recorded, the author was unable to find any explanation for this difference. Observations in the field indicated that Echinochloa seedlings were killed regardless of the depth at which the seed was located; whereas, most rice seedlings escaped injury if the seed was planted sufficiently deep. There appeared to be, however, a difference in response among varieties of rice. The following investigation was initiated to explain the differential response among varieties; however, the conclusions were expanded to explain the selective mechanism for controlling barnyardgrass in rice. The data presented in this paper are representative of results obtained in a series of experiments on this subject.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1960 , pp. 39 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allard, R. W., Ennis, W. B. Jr., De Rose, H. R., and Weaver, R. J. The action of isopropyl phenyl carbamate upon plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:589–596. 1946.Google Scholar
2. Baldwin, R. E., Freed, V. H., and Fang, S. C. Absorption and translocation of carbon-14 applied as O-isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate in Avena and Zea. Jour. of Ag. and Food Chem. 2:428–430. 1954.Google Scholar
3. Crabtree, G, and Loeffler, G. Some relations of growth to plant response to isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate. Proc. NEWCC 10:256–259. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Some effects of O-isopropyl N-phenyl-carbamate upon cereals. Science 105:95–96. 1947.Google Scholar
5. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Responses of crop plants to O-isoproply-N-phenyl carbamate. Bot. Gaz. 109:473–493. 1948.Google Scholar
6. Freed, V. H. IPC and chloro IPC as representative carbamates as herbicides. Proc. WWCC 13:21–27. 1952.Google Scholar
7. Mitchell, J. W., and Marth, P. C. Sensitivity of grasses and some crop plants to IPC. Science 106:15–17. 1947.Google Scholar