Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:34:23.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of 3-(p-Chlorophenyl)-1, 1-Dimethylurea in Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Get access

Extract

Since it was first discovered by Bucha and Todd, that 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea would kill most plants if applied at dosages of 20 pounds and above per acre there has been much speculation as to whether it is translocated in plants. Observations from early field trials indicating that soil treatments with this compound were more effective than foliar applications led to the assumption that entrance of the herbicide into plants was primarily through the roots. Loustalot demonstrated positively, however, that this substituted urea is also absorbed through the leaves and stems. Recent investigations at this laboratory, contrasting essentially equal applications on foliage and roots of several species, have also indicated that appreciable injury is caused by foliar absorption of the compound.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 177 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bucha, H. C., and Todd, C. W. 3-(p-Chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea—A New Herbicide. Science 114: 493. 1951.Google Scholar
2. Searle, N. E., and Cupery, H. E. Synthesis of C14 Ring-Labeled 3-(p-Chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea. In press.Google Scholar
3. Loustalot, A. J., and Cruzado, H. J. Private communication, 1952.Google Scholar
4. McCall, G. L. “CMU”, New Herbicide. Agr. Chem. 7: 4041, 127–129. 1952.Google Scholar