Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:15:34.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Studies of 2,4-D Esters in the Air

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald F. Adams
Affiliation:
Air Pollution Research Section, Division of Industrial Research, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
Craig M. Jackson
Affiliation:
Air Pollution Research Section, Division of Industrial Research, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
W. Lee Bamesberger
Affiliation:
Air Pollution Research Section, Division of Industrial Research, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
Get access

Abstract

Stationary and portable field sampling equipment and techniques are described for the collection of gaseous and aerosol forms of 2,4-D compounds. Air was sampled at the rate of 1 liter per minute through 10 ml of n-decane in a modified midget impinger maintained at approximately 1 C. Field sampling was conducted at two eastern Washington sites for approximately 106 days during the summer of 1963. The presence of isopropyl, butyl, and isooctyl esters of 2,4-D in the atmosphere was established by electron capture gas chromatography. Twenty-four hour average atmospheric concentrations of these esters ranged from undetectable to 3.1 μg/m3.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 1964 , pp. 280 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baskin, A. D., and Walker, E. A. 1953. The responses of tomato plants to vapors of 2,4-D and/or 2,4,5-T formulations at normal and higher temperatures. Weeds. 2:280287.Google Scholar
2. Bosin, W. A. 1963. Analysis of pesticide residues using micro-coulometric temperature-programmed gas chromatography Anal. Chem. 35:833837.Google Scholar
3. Burke, J. 1963. Programmed temperature gas chromatography (PTEC) and microcoulometric detection of chlorinated insecticides. J. Assoc. Official Agr. Chemists. 46:198204.Google Scholar
4. Coulson, D. M., Cavanagh, L. A., DeVries, J. E., and Walther, B. 1960. Microcoulometric gas chromatography of pesticides J. Agr. Food Chem. 8:399402.Google Scholar
5. Gosline, C. A., Falk, L. L., and Helmers, E. N. 1956. Air pollution handbook. Section 5–40. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
6. Hitchcock, A. E., Zimmerman, P. W., and Kirkpatrick, H. Jr. 1953. A simple, rapid biological method for determining the relative volatility of esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Cont. Boyce Thompson Inst. 17:243263.Google Scholar
7. King, L. J., and Cramer, J. A. Jr. 1951. Studies on the herbicidal properties and volatility of some polyethylene and polypropylene glycol ester of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Cont. Boyce Thompson Inst. 16:267278.Google Scholar
8. Miller, K. P., Weed, R. M., and Hitchcock, A. E. 1954. Comparative volatility of the n-butyl, 2 ethylhexyl and 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-propyl esters of 2,4-D. Cont. Boyce Thompson Inst. 17:397400.Google Scholar
9. Mullison, W. R., and Hummer, R. W. 1949. Some effects of the vapor of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid derivatives on various field-crop and vegetable seeds. Botan. Gaz. 111:7785.Google Scholar
10. Vernetti, J., and Freed, V. H. 2,4-D volatility studies, 1962. Progress Report, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Oregon State University.Google Scholar