Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:52:32.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photosynthesis in Dodder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. E. Pattee ,
K. R. Allred  and
H. H. Wiebe
H. E. Pattee
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Utah State University
K. R. Allred
Affiliation:
Utah State University, Logan, Utah
H. H. Wiebe
Affiliation:
Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Get access

Abstract

The photosynthetic capacities of three species of dodder, largeseed dodder (Cuscuta indecora, Choisy), field dodder (Cuscuta campestris, Yuncker), and small-seeded dodder (Cuscuta approximata, Bab.) were studied by radioactive carbon dioxide uptake in light and darkness, and by manometric methods. Both methods showed that all three species were able to carry on a small amount of photosynthesis. The photosynthetic capacity was highest in the seedling, and decreased as the dodder became parasitic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 1965 , pp. 193 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. MacKinney, G. 1935. On the plastid pigments of marsh dodder. J. Biol. Chem. 112:421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Schmucker, T. 1959. Biologie der Heterotrophen: Hohere Parasiten. p. 480–529. In Encyclopedia of plant physiology XI. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
3. Timmons, F. L., Lee, W. O., and Weldon, L. W. 1958. For high alfalfa seed yields control dodder. Utah Farm and Home Sci. 19:7–9.Google Scholar
4. Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H., and Stauffer, J. F. 1957. Manometric techniques. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, Minn., Burgess Publishing Co. Google Scholar
5. Walzel, Gertraud. 1952. Vitamin C in Cuscuta . Protoplasma 41:260–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar