Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:22:59.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photochemical Degradation of Diuron and Monuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. W. Weldon  and
F. L. Timmons
L. W. Weldon
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture
F. L. Timmons
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture
Get access

Extract

Considerable attention has been given during recent years to the fate of herbicides sprayed onto soil surfaces. The effect of light upon herbicides also has been studied extensively. Payne and Fults by means of a biological test found that the potency of 2,4–D was increased by exposure to ultraviolet light. Hansen and Buchholtz found that when a solution containing 2,4–D and riboflavin was exposed to light the activity of 2,4–D was reduced. They tentatively identified the breakdown product as 2,4–dichlorophenol. Later Bell positively identified it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1961 , pp. 111 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, G. R. On the photochemical degradation of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and the structurally related compounds in the presence and absence of riboflavin. Bot. Gaz. 118:133–136. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Birk, L. A. Penetration of and persistence in soil of the herbicide 3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea (CMU). Canadian Jour. of Agric. Sci. 35:377–387. 1955.Google Scholar
3. Dorschner, K. P., and Buchholtz, K. P. A spectrophotometric method for the determination of several chlorinated phenoxyacetic acids. Weeds 5:102–107. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. General Electric, Large Lamp Dept. Application Engineering, LS–103. 1956.Google Scholar
5. Hansen, J. R., and Buchholtz, K. P. Inactivation of 2,4–D by riboflavin in light. Weeds 1:237–242. 1952.Google Scholar
6. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. Jour. 47:93–104. 1955.Google Scholar
7. Payne, M. G., and Fults, J. L. Some effects of ultraviolet light on 2,4–D and related compounds. Science 106:37–39. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Weldon, L. W., Timmons, F. L., and Gale, A. F. Chemical control of annual weeds in alfalfa and red clover grown for seed production. Wyoming Agr. Exp. Sta. Mimeo Circ. 100. 1958.Google Scholar
9. Woodford, E. K., Holly, K., and McCready, C. C. Herbicides. Ann. Review of Pl. Physio. pp. 311–358. 1958.Google Scholar