Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:48:32.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of Microbiological Effects of Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jean S. Whiteside
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York
M. Alexander
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York
Get access

Extract

In considering the interaction between microorganisms and herbicides applied to the soil, two effects may become of great practical significance. One involves the potential inhibition or even germicidal action of the chemical to the microscopic inhabitants of the soil. These organisms, chiefly the bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes, occupy a unique position in biological cycles in terrestrial habitats and are essential for plant growth and soil fertility. The microorganisms decompose root and crop residues, mobilize the reserve of organic nitrogen and phosphorus, carry out transformations involving a change of oxidation state and bring about many other reactions necessary for crop production. Any deleterious influence, even of a temporary nature, could have a profound effect upon crop yields.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 1960 , pp. 204 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dorschner, K. P., and Buchholtz, K. P. A spectrophotometric method for the determination of several chlorinated phenoxyacetic acids. Weeds 5:102107. 1957.Google Scholar
2. Engel, M. S., and Alexander, M. Growth and autotrophic metabolism of Nitrosomonas europaea . J. Bacteriol. 76:217222. 1958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Fletcher, W. W. Effect of herbicides on the growth of Rhizobium trifolii . Nature 177:1244. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Kratochvil, D. E. Determination of the effect of several herbicides on soil microorganisms. Weeds 1:2531. 1951.Google Scholar
5. Newman, A. S. The effect of several plant-growth regulators on soil microorganisms and microbial processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 12:217221. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Otten, R. J., Dawson, J. E., and Schreiber, M. M. The effects of several herbicides on nitrification in soil. Proc. Northeastern Weed Control Conf. 11:120127. 1957.Google Scholar
7. Quastel, J. H., and Scholefield, P. G. Biochemistry of nitrification in soil. Bacteriol. Rev. 15:153. 1951.Google Scholar
8. Stanier, R. Y. Simultaneous adaptation: a new technique for the study of metabolic pathways. J. Bacteriol. 54:339348. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H., and Stauffer, J. F. Manometric techniques. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minn. 1957.Google Scholar
10. Webley, D. M., Duff, R. B., and Farmer, V. C. Formation of a β–hydroxyacid as an intermediate in the microbiological conversion of monochlorophenoxybutyric acids to the corresponding substituted acetic acids. Nature 179:11301131. 1957.Google Scholar
11. Webley, D. M., Duff, R. B., and Farmer, V. C. The influence of chemical structure on β–oxidation by soil nocardias. J. Gen. Microbiol. 18:733746. 1958.Google Scholar