Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:38:24.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Maleic Hydrazide and Endothal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Moacyr Maestri  and
H. B. Currier
H. B. Currier
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access

Extract

Interactions among the components of an herbicidal solution may take place (a) in the solution itself, (b) at the plant surface or within tissues to influence absorption and translocation, and (c) at the cellular site of toxic action. This broad meaning of the term interaction is employed in the present report. Similarly, the meanings of antagonism and synergism are considered as inhibition and enhancement, respectively, of the toxic action of one substance due to the influence of another, regardless of the location and nature of the interaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1958 , pp. 315 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S., Currier, H. B., and Drever, H. R. Some studies on the herbicidal properties of maleic hydrazide. Hilgardia (in press). 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Currier, H. B. Effects of toxic compounds: stimulation, inhibition, injury and death. In Ruhland, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology 2:792–825. 1956.Google Scholar
3. Currier, H. B., and Crafts, A. S. Maleic hydrazide, a selective herbicide. Science 111:152–153. 1950.Google Scholar
4. Currier, H. B., Day, B. E., and Crafts, A. S. Some effects of maleic hydrazide on plants. Bot. Gaz. 112:272–280. 1951.Google Scholar
5. Hall, W. C. Evidence on the auxin-ethylene balance hypothesis of foliar abscission. Bot. Gaz. 113:310–322. 1952.Google Scholar
6. Hall, W. C., and Lane, H. C. Compositional and physiological changes associated with the chemical defoliation of cotton. Plant Physiol. 27:754–768. 1952.Google Scholar
7. Isenberg, F. M. R., Jensen, C. O., and Odland, M. L. Effect of maleic hydrazide on the respiration of mature onion bulbs. Science 120:464–465. 1954.Google Scholar
8. Linder, P. J. Absorption of some new herbicides by plants. Proc. NEWCC 5:7–12. 1951.Google Scholar
9. Naylor, A. W., and Davis, E. A. Respiration response of root tips to maleic hydrazide. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club 78:73–79. 1951.Google Scholar
10. Pallas, J. E. Jr., and Crafts, A. S. Critical preparation of plant material for autoradiography. Science 125:192–193. 1957.Google Scholar
11. Poland, J. L. General progress report on field studies with endothal. Proc. NEWCC. 6:45–55. 1952.Google Scholar
12. Pridham, A. M. S. Preliminary report on defoliation of nursery stock by chemical means. Proc. NEWCC 5 (Suppl.):127–140. 1951.Google Scholar
13. Pridham, A. M. S., and Hsu, R. Temperatures at which defoliated twigs of Forsythia intermedia spectabilis show cold injury. Proc. NEWCC 7:289–292. 1953.Google Scholar
14. Pridham, A. M. S., and Hsu, R. Defoliation response of Ligustrum ovalifolium to 3,6–endoxohexahydrophthalate formulations. Proc. NEWCC 7:341–345. 1953.Google Scholar
15. Schoene, D. L., and Hoffman, O. L. Maleic hydrazide, a unique growth regulant. Science 109:588–590. 1949.Google Scholar
16. Sorensen, L. O. Effects of maleic hydrazide on photosynthesis and respiration of red kidney bean. Dissertation Abstracts 16:1569. 1956.Google Scholar
17. Stahler, L. M. Promising grass killers. Proc. NCWCC 7:117–119. 1950.Google Scholar
18. Tischler, N., Bates, J. C., and Quimba, G. P. A new group of defoliantherbicidal chemicals. Proc. NEWCC 4:51–84. 1950.Google Scholar
19. Tischler, N., Quimba, G. P., and Bejuki, W. M. Activators which considerably increase the defoliant and the phytotoxic properties of endothal. Proc. NEWCC 5:35–44. 1951.Google Scholar
20. Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H., and Staufer, J. F. Manometric Techniques and Tissue Metabolism. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis. 1949.Google Scholar
21. Yamaguchi, S., and Crafts, A. S. Methods for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using C14–labeled compounds. Hilgardia (in press) 1958.Google Scholar
22. Zukel, J. W., Smith, A. E., Stone, G. M., and Davies, M. E. Effect of some factors on rate of absorption of maleic hydrazide. (Abst.). Plant Physiol. 31 (Suppl.):xxi. 1956.Google Scholar