Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:12:15.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of 2,4-D on Enzyme Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. J. Wort
D. J. Wort*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia
Get access

Extract

Most workers with herbicides agree that the effects brought about by many of these substances must be the results of altered enzymatic action within the plant. The actual mechanism is still a matter of conjecture in spite of some excellent research and well founded theorizing. A brief examination of enzymes and enzyme action in the light of results obtained with 2,4-D particularly, may suggest how this herbicide fits into the enzyme picture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 131 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bonner, J., and Bandurski, R. S. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 3: 59. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brakke, M. K., and Nickell, L. G. Bot. Gaz., 113: 482. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Crafts, A. S. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 4: 253. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Felber, I. M. Amer. Jour. Bot. 35: 555. 1948.Google Scholar
5. Freiberg, S. R., and Clark, H. E. Bot. Gaz. 113: 322. 1952.Google Scholar
6. Fults, J. Research Rept. West. Weed Control conf. 1952.Google Scholar
7. Gall, H. J. F. Bot. Gaz. 110: 319. 1949.Google Scholar
8. Galston, A. W., and Baker, R. S. Amer. Jour. Bot. 38: 190. 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Galston, A. W. Compt. rend, 232: 1505. 1951.Google Scholar
10. Goldacre, P. L. Australian Jour. Sci. Res. B 2: 154. 1949.Google Scholar
11. Goldacre, P. L. Australian Jour. Sci. Res. 4: 293. 1951.Google Scholar
12. Hagen, O. E., Clagett, C. O., and Helgeson, E. A. Science 110:116. 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hamner, C. L., Sell, H. M., Klomparens, W., and Vaughn, J. B. Bot. Gaz. 112: 135. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kelly, S., and Avery, G. S. Amer. Jour. Bot. 36: 421. 1949.Google Scholar
15. Kvamme, O. J., Clagett, C. O., and Treumann, W. B. Arch. Biochem. 24: 321. 1949.Google Scholar
16. Lo, T., and Chem, S. Jour. Chinese Chem. Soc. 15: 98. 1947.Google Scholar
17. Luecke, R. W., Hamner, C. L., and Sell, H. M. Plant Physiol. 24: 546. 1949.Google Scholar
18. Meletti, P. Nuovo. Giorn. Bot. Hal. 51: 449. 1950.Google Scholar
19. Miller, I. H., and Burris, R. H. Amer. Jour. Bot. 38: 547. 1951.Google Scholar
20. Neely, W. B., Ball, C. D., Hamner, C. L., and Sell, H. M. Science 11:118. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Neely, W. B., Ball, C. D., Hamner, C. L., and Sell, H. M. Plant Physiol. 25: 525. 1950.Google Scholar
22. Olsen, K. L. Abstract of Papers Amer. Soc. Plant Physiol. Western Section. 1950.Google Scholar
23. Ravazzoni, C. Ricerca Sci. 19: 376. 1949. Chem. Abstr. 43:8009a. 1949.Google Scholar
24. Rebstock, T. L., Hamner, C. L., Ball, C. D., and Sell, H. M. Plant Physiol. 27: 639. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Sell, H. M., Luecke, R. M., Taylor, S. M., and Hamner, C. L. Plant Physiol. 24: 295. 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Unrau, J., and Larter, E. N. Can. Jour. Bot. 30: 22. 1952.Google Scholar
27. Van Overbeek, J. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 3: 87. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Wagenknecht, A. C., Riker, A. J., Allen, T. C., and Burris, R. H. Amer. Jour. Bot. 38: 550. 1951.Google Scholar
29. Weintraub, R. L. Symposium Rept. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1952.Google Scholar
30. Weintraub, R. L. Jour. Agr. and Food Chem. 1: 250. 1953.Google Scholar
31. Wort, D. J. Proc. 4th West. Can. Weed conf. 1950.Google Scholar
32. Wort, D. J. and Cowie, L. M. Plant Physiol. 28: 135. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Yakushkina, N. I. Doklady Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 61: 939. 1948.Google Scholar