Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:12:14.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endothal Derivatives as Aquatic Herbicides in Fishery Habitats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles R. Walker
Charles R. Walker*
Affiliation:
Fish Control Laboratory, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, La Crosse, Wisconsin. Formerly with Missouri Conservation Commission, Fisheries Section, Columbia, Missouri
Get access

Abstract

The disodium salt of 3,6-endoxohexahydrophthalic acid (disodium endothal) and the derivative identified by the manufacturer as the di-N,N′-dimethylococoamine salt of endothal (coded as TD-47) were particularly effective upon submersed species of aquatic vegetation as contact herbicides. Disodium endothal at concentrations of 0.5 to 10.0 ppmw was effective in controlling approximately 50 per cent of the 19 species of plants involved in 270 tests. TD-47 at concentrations of 0.02 to 10.0 ppmw trolled 77 per cent of the 11 plant species in 94 tests.

Algae (Chara, Cladophora, Pithophora, and Spirogyra) were more effectively controlled by TD-47 than by disodium endothal. Although TD-47 was at least 10 times more herbicidal than disodium endothal, it was about 100 times more toxic to fish. Disodium endothal was more than 50 per cent effective on submersed aquatic plants at rates in excess of 2.5 ppmw with a wide margin of safety in fish (4- to 10-fold). Disodium endothal had a median tolerance limit ranging from 95 to 150 ppmw in the aggregate of nine fish species tested extensively. Median tolerance limits for TD-47 ranged from about 0.06 to 0.3 ppmw for five species of fish. TD-47 applied at a concentration lethal to fish (0.3 to 1.0 ppmw) was effective as a dual management tool in controlling vegetation and achieving partial or complete renovation of stunted fish populations.

Young, growing vegetation was most susceptible to control, and best results were achieved at water temperatures exceeding 60 F. Higher rates were required to kill plants as they matured and stands became dense. Endothal liquid formulations were superior to granules in controlling algal mats, floating and emergent plants. Granules were more effective on submersed rooted plants.

TD-47 residues were of short duration. The rate of disappearance depended on time and concentration. Detectable residues disappeared within 8 days following application of 0.3 ppmw and within 2 weeks for 0.6 ppmw. However, 1.0 to 3.0 ppmw took up to 25 days to disappear. Some residues were found in fish-food organisms from treated enclosures 3 weeks after application. Fish flesh showed no absorption of endothal-armeens at sublethal concentrations. Intraperitoneal injection of endothal into fish produced a disturbance of the osmoregulation. The physiological effect of endothal was measured by chemical analysis of blood serum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1963 , pp. 226 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. A. P. H. A., A. W. W. A., and W. P. C. F. 1960. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 11th Ed. Am. Public Health Assoc., New York. 625 p.Google Scholar
2. Bond, C. E., Lewis, R. H., and Fryer, J. L. 1960. Toxicity of various herbicidal materials to fishes. Trans. 1959 Seminar PHS, U. S. Dept. Health, Educ. and Welfare, Tech. Report W60–3:96–101.Google Scholar
3. Brown, M. H. 1957. The physiology of fishes. Metabolism (Volume 1). Academic Press, Inc., New York. 447 p.Google Scholar
4. Brown, M. H. 1957. The physiology of fishes. Behavior (Volume 2). Academic Press, Inc., New York. 526 p.Google Scholar
5. Cottam, C. C., and Tarzwell, C. M. 1960. Research for the establishment of water quality criteria for aquatic life. Trans. 1959 Seminar; Public Health Service, U. S. Dept. Health, Educ., and Welfare; Technical Report W60–3:226–232.Google Scholar
6. DeBeer, B. J. 1945. The graphic calculation of bioassays. J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 92:1–11.Google Scholar
7. Doudoroff, P., Anderson, B. G., Burdick, G. E., Galtsoff, P. G., Hart, W. B., Patrick, R., Strong, E. R., Surber, E. W., and Van Horn, W. M. 1951. Bioassay methods for the evaluation of acute toxicity of industrial wastes to fish. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 23:1380–1397.Google Scholar
8. Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L., and Summerson, W. H. 1954. Practical physiological chemistry. 13th Edit. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., N. Y. 1439 p.Google Scholar
9. Hart, W. B., Doudoroff, P., and Greenbank, J. 1945. The evaluation of the toxicology of industrial wastes, chemicals, and other substances to freshwater fishes. The Atlantic Refining Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 317 p.Google Scholar
10. Hiltibran, R. C. 1962. Duration of toxicity of endothal in water. Weeds 10:17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Huish, M. T. 1957. Food habits of three centrarchidae in Lake George, Florida. Proc. Conf. S. E. Assoc. Game & Fish Comm. 17:293–302.Google Scholar
12. Kutkuhn, J. H. 1957. Utilization of plankton by juvenile gizzard shad in a shallow prairie lake. Trans. Am. Fish Soc., 87:80–103.Google Scholar
13. Lawrence, J. M. 1958. Methods for controlling aquatic weeds in fish ponds with emphasis on use of chemicals. Agric. Exp. Stat. Ala. Polytech Inst. Prog. Rept. Ser. No. 69, March pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
14. Litchfield, J. T., and Wilcoxon, F. 1949. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 95:99–114.Google Scholar
15. Lucas, F. V., and Schultz, L. B. 1961. Manual of laboratory procedures. Path. Lab., Univ. Mo. Med. Center, Vol. 1 & 11.Google Scholar
16. McFarland, W. N., and Norris, K. S. 1958. The control of pH by buffers in fish transport. Calif. Fish & Game 44:291–310.Google Scholar
17. Norris, K. S., Brocate, F., Calandrino, F., and McFarland, W. N. 1960. A survey of fish transportation methods and equipment. California Fish & Game 46:5–33.Google Scholar
18. Surber, E. W. 1932. Controlling vegetation in fish ponds with sodium arsenite. U. S. Dept. Commerce, Investigational Report No. II, Vol. 1, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
19. Surber, E. W. 1961. Improving sport fishing by control of aquatic weeds. Fish & Wildlife Service Circular 128, pp. 1–37 and appendix.Google Scholar
20. Surber, E. W. and Pickering, Q. H. 1962. Acute toxicity of endothal, diquat, hyamine, dalapon and silvex to fish; Prog. Fish. Cult., Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Snieszko, S. F. 1960. Microhematocrit as a tool in fishery research and management. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept., Fish. 341, 15 p.Google Scholar
22. Walker, C. R. 1960. Herbicides. Trans. 1959 Seminar; Public Health Service, U. S. Dept. Health, Educ., and Welfare; Technical Report W60–3:272.Google Scholar
23. Walker, C. R. 1961. Herbicide toxicity and ecology in Missouri fish ponds with reference to aquatic weed control. Proc. NCWCC 17:30.Google Scholar
24. Walker, C. R. 1959. Control of certain aquatic weeds in Missouri farm ponds. Weeds 7:310–316.Google Scholar
25. Walker, C. R. 1954. Notes from an investigation of the use of inorganic fertilizers in Missouri farm ponds. 16th Midwest Wildlife Conf. (Mimeo.) 6 p.Google Scholar
26. Welch, P. S. 1948. Limnological methods. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York. pp. 381.Google Scholar