Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:22:39.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Weeds and Cultural Practices on Sorghum Yields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. F. Wiese ,
J. W. Collier ,
L. E. Clark  and
U. D. Havelka
A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Southwestern Great Plains Field Station, Bushland
J. W. Collier
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station
L. E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station
U. D. Havelka
Affiliation:
Blackland Experiment Station, Temple
Get access

Abstract

Sorghum grain yield losses in Northwest and Central Texas caused by uncontrolled weed growth varied from 8 to 41%. Under high moisture conditions, sorghum competed best with weeds when planted thickly in narrow rows. With less moisture, seeding in wide rows resulted in more effective competition. If rains produced weed germination immediately after planting, competition with the sorghum was more severe than when weeds germinated 1 or 2 months after sorghum planting. Several mechanical weed control methods were very successful.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1964 , pp. 209 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Phillips, W. M. 1960. Pre-emergence weed control in grain sorghum. Proc. NCWCC 17:26.Google Scholar
2. Talbert, R. E., and Fletchall, O. H. 1958. Neburon for preemergence weed control in grain sorghums. Proc. NCWCC 15:13.Google Scholar
3. Wiese, A. F., and Rea, H. E. 1962. Treating irrigated grain sorghum with pre-emergence herbicides. Crop Sci. 2:29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar