Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:34:21.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Surfactants on the Water Solubility of Herbicides, and the Foliar Phytotoxicity of Surfactants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ralph E. Temple
Affiliation:
Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu, Hawaii
H. Wayne Hilton
Affiliation:
Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu, Hawaii
Get access

Abstract

The apparent solubility in water of 2-ethylamino-4-isopropylamino-6-methylmercapto-s-triazine [ametryne], 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea [diuron], and 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine [atrazine] was increased when a surfactant was added to the water. At 0.5% surfactant concentrations, considerable variation in solubility was found, both as regards the herbicide and surfactant used, as measured by ultraviolet absorption spectrophotometry. The two triazines were more soluble in cationic surfactants, followed by anionic and nonionic; diuron was more soluble in cationic followed by nonionic and anionic types.

Minimum lethal levels of surfactant in water for 2 week old cucumber plants varied from about 0.1% for the cationic to 0.2% for most nonionic and 1.0% or more for anionics of the alkyl aryl sulfonate type.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 1963 , pp. 297 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S. The chemistry and mode of action of herbicides. Interscience Publishers, New York, 1961, page 115.Google Scholar
2. Currier, H. B., and Dybing, C. D. 1959. Foliar penetration of herbicides. Review and present status. Weeds 7:195213.Google Scholar
3. Dybing, C. D., and Currier, H. B. 1961. Foliar penetration by chemicals. Plant Physiol. 36:169174.Google Scholar
4. Ennis, W. B. Jr., Williamson, R. E., and Dorschner, K. P. 1952. Studies on spray retention by leaves of different plants. Weeds 1:274286.Google Scholar
5. Freed, V. H. and Montgomery, M. 1958. The effect of surfactants on foliar absorption of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. Weeds 6:386389.Google Scholar
6. Foy, C. L. 1962. Penetration and initial translocation of 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon) in individual leaves of Zea mays L. Weeds 10:3539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Furmidge, C. G. L. 1962. Physico-chemical studies on agricultural sprays. IV. The retention of spray liquids on leaf surfaces. J. Sci. Food Agr. 13:127140.Google Scholar
8. Furmidge, C. G. L. 1959. Physico-chemical studies on agricultural sprays. III. Variation of phytotoxicity with the chemical structure of surface-active agents. J. Sci. Food Agr. 10:419425.Google Scholar
9. Furmidge, C. G. L. 1959. Physico-chemical studies on agricultural sprays. I. General principles of incorporating surface-active agents as spray supplements. J. Sci. Food Agr. 10:267273.Google Scholar
10. Hull, H. M. 1960. A tabular summary of research dealing with translocation of foliar-applied herbicides and selected growth regulators. Weeds 8:214231.Google Scholar
11. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effect of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G., and Sheets, T. J. 1961. The effectiveness of five phenylureas as foliar sprays and the influence of surfactants on their activity. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. 14:5459.Google Scholar
13. Young, H. Y. and Gortner, W. A. 1953. Microdetermination of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in plant tissue. Anal. Chem. 25:800802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Yuen, Quan H. and Hilton, H. W. 1962. The adsorption of monuron and diuron by Hawaiian sugarcane soils. J. Agr. and Food Chem. 10:386392.Google Scholar