Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:33:33.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disappearance of Herbicides from Irrigated Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. F. Arle ,
J. H. Miller  and
T. J. Sheets
H. F. Arle
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Tempe, Arizona, Shatter, California, and Beltsville, Maryland
J. H. Miller
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Tempe, Arizona, Shatter, California, and Beltsville, Maryland
T. J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Tempe, Arizona, Shatter, California, and Beltsville, Maryland
Get access

Abstract

The phytotoxicities of three phenylurea herbicides applied annually to cotton at rates used for selective weed control were studied in irrigated soils of the southwestern United States. Yields of seed cotton were generally not affected by annual applications of 3-(p-chlorophenyl-1)-1,1-dimethylurea (monuron) and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron). Annual applications of 3-phenyl-1,1-dimethylurea (fenuron) often reduced seed cotton yields. Mild chlorosis of foliage of cotton seedlings was occasionally observed when monuron was used annually. Although diuron affected the growth of oats and barley 6 to 12 months after application, it caused no adverse effect on cotton seedlings. Monuron residues affected barley and oats more severely than did diuron residues. Accumulation of diuron and monuron from annual applications at rates used for selective weed control in cotton appears unlikely.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 56 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Danielson, L. L. 1956. The crop toxicity period of CMU in a sandy clay loam soil. Weeds 4:255–263.Google Scholar
2. Ennis, W. B. Jr., Shaw, W. C., Danielson, L. L., Klingman, D. L., and Timmons, F. L. 1963. Impact of chemical weed control on farm management practices. Advances in Agronomy 15:161–210.Google Scholar
3. Hill, G. D. 1954. Substituted ureas for pre-emergence weed control in cotton-soil relationships. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. 7:76–87.Google Scholar
4. Hill, G. D., McGahan, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Jordan, L. S., Coggins, C. W. Jr., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of substituted phenylureas. Weeds 12:1–4.Google Scholar
6. Loustalot, A. J., Muzik, T. J., and Cruzado, H. J. 1953. Persistence of CMU in soil. Agr. Chem. 8:52–53, 97–99, 101.Google Scholar
7. Ogle, R. E. and Warren, G. F. 1954. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257–273.Google Scholar
8. Sheets, T. J. 1958. The comparative toxicities of four phenylurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413–424.Google Scholar
9. Sherburne, H. R. and Freed, V. H. 1954. Adsorption of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939.Google Scholar
10. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.Google Scholar
11. Weldon, L. W. and Timmons, F. L. 1961. Photochemical degradation of diuron and monuron. Weeds 9:111–116.Google Scholar
12. Weldon, L. W. and Timmons, F. L. 1961. Penetration and persistence of diuron in soil. Weeds 9:195–203.Google Scholar
13. Wolf, D. E. 1951. CMU—A new herbicide. Proc. NCWCC 8:104.Google Scholar