No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Differences Among Butyl, Ethyl, and Isopropyl Ester Formulations of 2,4–D, 2,4,5–T, and MCPA in the Control of Big Sagebrush
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2017
Extract
It has been difficult to accept as conclusive the indications that butyl ester forms of 2,4–D are more effective in the control of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) than are isopropyl ester forms (2, 3, 5). Such indications may have been due to the manner of formulating the materials, and to the additives contained, rather than to differences between the esters. Additional information is necessary to prevent bias in the choice among ester forms.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America
References
Literature Cited
1.
Cochran, William G., and Cox, Gertrude M.
Experimental Designs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 173. 1950.Google Scholar
2.
Colorado, A. & College, M.
Sagebrush range improvement by eradication, reseeding, management. (Mimeo.)
1950.Google Scholar
3.
Cornelius, Donald R., and Graham, Charles A.
Selective herbicides for improving California forest ranges. Jour. Range Management
4:95–100. 1951.Google Scholar
4.
Hyder, D. N.
Controlling big sagebrush with growth regulators. Jour. Range Management
6:109–116. 1953.Google Scholar
5.
Hyder, D. N.
Spray to control big sagebrush. Oregon Agri. Exp. Sta. Bul.
538. 1954.Google Scholar
6.
Hyder, D. N. and Sneva, F. A.
Effect of form and rate of active ingredient, spraying season, solution volume, and type of solvent on mortality of big sagebrush, (Artemisia tridentata)
. Oregon Agri. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul.
35. 1955.Google Scholar