Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:11:08.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Southern Naiad in Florida Drainage and Irrigation Channels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert D. Blackburn  and
Lyle W. Weldon
Robert D. Blackburn
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Lyle W. Weldon
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Get access

Abstract

The most promising of 13 herbicides for the control of southern naiad (Najas guadalupensis (Spreng.) Magnus) were acrylaldehyde (acrolein), mono-N,N-dimethylcocoamine and di-N,N-dimethylcocoamine salts of 7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid (endothall), 6,7-dihydrodipyrido[1,2-a:2’,1′-c] pyrazidiinium salt (diquat), and 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bypyridinium salt (paraquat). Acrolein and the 2 alkylamine salts of endothall gave the most rapid kill of southern naiad but retreatment was necessary at the end of 16 weeks. Diquat and paraquat were the 2 most promising materials evaluated. Large scale applications of acrolein, di-N,N-dimethylcocoamine salt of endothall and diquat confirmed these results. Diquat and paraquat were the only herbicides of the 13 that were not toxic to fish.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 1964 , pp. 295 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Balcom, R. B. 1949. What price weeds? U. S. Bureau of Reclam. Reclam. Era. 35:171–172.Google Scholar
2. Calderbank, A. 1960. Diquat: a new herbicide and desiccant. Agr. Vet. Chem. Jour. 1:197–200.Google Scholar
3. Harrison, D. S., Blackburn, R. D., Kretchman, D. W., Orsenigo, J. R., Seaman, D. E., and Weldon, L. W. 1962. Aquatic weed control. Florida Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 219. 16 p.Google Scholar
4. Lawrence, J. M., Blackburn, R. D., Davis, D. E., Spencer, S. L., and Beasley, P. G. 1961. Aquatic weed herbicides evaluated. In Highlights of agricultural research. Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama. 8:2–3.Google Scholar
5. Seale, Charles C., Randolph, J. W., and Stephens, J. C. 1952. Aromatic solvents for the control of the submersed water weed naiad, Najas guadalupensis, in south Florida. Weeds 1:366–371.Google Scholar
6. Stephens, J. C., Craig, A. L., and Harrison, D. S. 1957. Controlling submersed water weeds with emulsifiable solvents in south Florida. Florida Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. S-97. 7 p.Google Scholar
7. Stephens, J. C., Blackburn, R. D., Seaman, D. E., and Weldon, L. W. 1962. Flow retardance by channel weeds and their control. Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 89:31–53.Google Scholar
8. Timmons, F. L., Weldon, L. W., Yeo, R. R., Arle, H. F., Bruns, V. F., and Hodgson, J. M. 1960. Herbicidal control of submersed aquatic weeds in western irrigation channels. Abstracts, Weed Soc. Am. 66–67.Google Scholar
9. Van Overbeek, J., Hughes, W. J., and Blondeau, R. 1959. Acrolein for control of water weeds and disease-carrying snails. Science. 129:335–336.Google Scholar