Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:33:54.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Bedstraw (Galium mollugo) with Alpha-Phenoxypropionic Acid Derivatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jal S. Parakh  and
Marvin M. Schreiber
Jal S. Parakh
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
Marvin M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
Get access

Extract

Bedstraw (Galium mollugo L.) is a deep-rooted perennial weed present throughout New York and many areas of the northeastern United States and Europe. It occurs in pasture, meadows, waste areas and along ditch banks and roadsides. This weed assumed importance comparatively recently and almost concurrently with the increasing popularity and widespread use of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.).

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1960 , pp. 94 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aberg, E. Weed control research and development in Sweden. Brit. WCC Proc. 3:141–162. 1956.Google Scholar
2. Byrnes, W. R., Bramble, W. C., and Worley, D. P. A test of 2,4,5–TP, 2,4,5–T and ATA on mixed oaks and associated species. NEWCC Proc. 11:118–195. 1957.Google Scholar
3. Coulter, L. L., and Gibson, J. W. A progress report of field experience with silvex. NCWCC Proc 11:90–91. 1954.Google Scholar
4. Darrow, R. A., and McCully, W. Y. Effects of single and repeated aerial applications of herbicides on post and blackjack oak. NCWCC Res. Rpt. 11:124–125. 1954.Google Scholar
5. Elwell, H. M. New herbicide controlled oak brush and resulted in increased native grass production. Weeds 2:302–303. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Elwell, H. M., Elder, W. C., Klingman, D. L., and Larson, R. E. Aerial applications of herbicides on oak in Oklahoma. NCWCC Proc. 11:91–95. 1954.Google Scholar
7. Fisher, C. E., Behrens, R., and Watson, J. Relative tolerance of cotton to some growth regulator herbicides used for brush control. SWC Proc. 7:268–274. 1954.Google Scholar
8. Fults, J. L., and Payne, M. Y. A biometric evaluation of the growth-regulating and herbicidal properties of some organic compounds. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 39:667–681. 1947.Google Scholar
9. Gibson, J. W. Silvex—a new herbicide for brush control in the South SWC Proc. 8:255–259. 1955.Google Scholar
10. Hitchcock, A. E., and Zimmerman, P. W. Root-inducing activity of phenoxy compounds in relation to their structure. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 12:497–507. 1942.Google Scholar
11. Hitchcock, A. E., and Zimmerman, P. W. Comparative root-inducing activity of phenoxyacids. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 45:187–189. 1944.Google Scholar
12. Hitchcock, A. E., and Zimmerman, P. W. Methods of rating the root-inducing activity of phenoxy acids and other growth substances. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 14:21–38. 1945.Google Scholar
13. Korsmo, E. Anatomy of Weeds. Grondahl and Sons, Oslo. 1954.Google Scholar
14. Leafe, E. L. A new development in selective weed control. Part II. Effect on cereal development. Brit. WCC Proc. 3:633–642. 1956.Google Scholar
15. Lush, G. B. A new. development in selective weed control. Part I. Introduction and weed control data. Brit. WCC Proc. 3:625–632. 1956.Google Scholar
16. Selleck, Y. W., and Coupland, R. T. Relative effect of 2–(2,4,5–TP) in comparison with 2,4–D on annual weeds. Canad. Nat'l. Weed Comm. West. Sec. Res. Rpt. p. 76. 1956.Google Scholar
17. Shaw, W. C., and Gentner, W. A. The selective herbicidal properties of several variously substituted phenoxyalkylcarboxylic acids. Weeds 5:75–92. 1957.Google Scholar
18. Silker, T. H., and Darrow, R. A. Aerial applications of 2,4,5–T and silvex for hardwood control and increased forage production in scrub-hardwoodpine stands in East Texas. SWC Proc. 9:130–133. 1956.Google Scholar
19. Steenis, J. H., Adams, D., and Wilson, K. A. Investigations on alligator weed control. Weed Soc. Am. Abst. 2:59. 1958.Google Scholar
20. Terry, C. W. Experimental mechanical equipment for application of weed control chemicals. NEWCC Proc. 6:3–5. 1952.Google Scholar
21. Thompson, H. E., Swanson, C. P., and Norman, A. G. New growth regulating compounds. I. Summary of growth inhibitory activities of some organic compounds as determined by three tests. Bot. Gaz. 107:476–507. 1946.Google Scholar
22. Wiltse, M. G., Dolton, R. L., Ferguson, H. C., and Rossman, W. R. Comparisons of commercial herbicides for brush control on power line rights-of-way. NEWCC Proc. 12:201–211. 1958.Google Scholar
23. Younger, R. R. Preliminary studies using Kuron as an aquatic herbicide. NEWCC Proc. 12:332–337. 1958.Google Scholar