Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:57:46.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield and Physiological Response of Flue-Cured Tobacco to Simulated Glyphosate Drift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ian C. Burke ,
Walter E. Thomas ,
Wendy A. Pline-Srnić ,
Loren R. Fisher ,
W. David Smith  and
John W. Wilcut
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
Box 7620, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Walter E. Thomas
Affiliation:
Box 7620, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Wendy A. Pline-Srnić
Affiliation:
Syngenta, Jealotts Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6EY, UK
Loren R. Fisher
Affiliation:
Box 7620, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
W. David Smith
Affiliation:
Box 7620, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Box 7620, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 2001 at the Tobacco Research Station near Oxford, NC, and in 2002 at the Lower Coastal Plains Research Station near Kinston, NC, to determine tobacco yield, injury, and shikimic acid accumulation in response to simulated glyphosate drift. Glyphosate was applied to 12- to 13-cm-high tobacco ‘K326’ early postemergence at 0, 9, 18, 35, 70, 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 (1×) g ai/ha. Crop injury was rated 7 and 35 d after treatment (DAT) and shikimic acid accumulation in leaves at 7 DAT, tobacco yield, and leaf grade index (whole-plant index of harvest interval leaf value) were also assessed. Shikimic acid accumulation and injury symptoms increased similarly as glyphosate rate increased. Glyphosate rates of 140 g/ha (0.125 of recommended rate) or higher resulted in significant crop injury, reduced tobacco yield, and decreased leaf grade index. Shikimic acid accumulation at 7 DAT was inversely related to tobacco yield. Shikimic acid accumulation was found to be an effective diagnostic tool to determine glyphosate drift in tobacco; however, in-season data are needed to correlate shikimic acid accumulation with yield loss.

Keywords

Glyphosate; tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. ‘K326’Crop injuryherbicide assayshikimateDAT, days after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 255 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2001. Roundup Ultra Supplemental Label 21137×3-20. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Acreage Data: Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg0602.pdf. Accessed: February 4, 2003.Google Scholar
Buehring, N. W., Massey, J. H., and Reynolds, D. B. 2003. The effect of sublethal rates of glyphosate on shikimate accumulation in corn (Zea mays). Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 56:323.Google Scholar
Collins, W. K. and Hawks, S. N. Jr. 1993. Principles of Flue-Cured Tobacco Production. Raleigh, NC: W. K. Collins and S. N. Hawk Jr. Pp. 11–17, 212.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 33–42, 511.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufan, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant response to weed control practices. in Camper, E. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. Pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Holländer-Czytko, H. and Amrhein, N. 1983. Subcellular compartmentation of shikimic acid and phenylalanine in buckwheat cell suspension cultures grown in the presence of shikimate pathway inhibitors. Plant Sci. Lett. 29:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, H. R. 1982. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated drift from selected herbicides. Weed Sci. 30:311–315.Google Scholar
Kassim, A. K. and Peterson, D. 1999. Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 13:264–270.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. E. and Street, J. E. 2003. Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to glyphosate applied to simulated drift. Weed Technol. 17:234–238.Google Scholar
Lydon, J. and Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate induction of elevated levels of hydroxybenzoic acids in higher plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:813–818.Google Scholar
Mollenhauer, C., Smart, C. C., and Amrhein, N. 1987. Glyphosate toxicity in the shoot apical region of the tomato plant. I. Plastid swelling is the initial ultrastructural feature following in vivo inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid 3-phosphate synthase. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 29:55–65.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Duke, S. O., Edmisten, K. L., and Wells, R. 2002. Tolerance and accumulation of shikimic acid in response to glyphosate applications in glyphosate resistant and nonglyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:506–512.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. L., Thomas, W. E., Pline, W. A., Burke, I. C., Jordan, D. L., and Wilcut, J. W. 2003. Yield and physiological response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to glyphosate drift. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:30.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 7.00. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S., Jensen, J., and Fuerst, P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:213–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Singh, B. K. 1998. Rapid determination of glyphosate injury to plants and identification of glyphosate-resistant plants. Weed Technol. 12:527–530.Google Scholar
Smith, W. D. and Fisher, L. R. 2001. Agronomic management practices affecting tobacco quality. in Smith, W. D. and Fisher, L. R., eds. 2001 Flue-Cured Tobacco Information. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. AG-187. Pp. 111–114.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., Robinson, B., Pline-Srni&cacute, W. A., Edminsten, K. L., Wells, R., and Wilcut, J. W. 2005. Yield and physiological response of nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol. 19:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar