Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T12:49:20.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Yield Response to Winter Annual Broadleaf Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert C. Scott ,
Thomas F. Peeper  and
Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Selected herbicide treatments from 25 winter annual broadleaf weed control experiments conducted across Oklahoma from 1979 to 1993 were examined for winter wheat yield response to weed control. All experiments contained one or two of the same three weeds (henbit, bushy wallflower, or cutleaf eveningprimrose) as the primary target(s). Herbicide treatments included chlorsulfuron at 8.8 or 17.6 g ai/ha, and/or 2,4-D at 420 g ae/ha, all broadcast POST to wheat. Most herbicide treatments controlled the weeds, but increased wheat grain yield at only one site, wherein bushy wallflower density was 830/m2. Correlation analysis found no relationship between weed densities and wheat yield when chlorsulfuron at 8.8 g/ha was applied for henbit or moderate levels of bushy wallflower or cutleaf eveningprimrose. There was a significant positive relationship favoring spraying of bushy wallflower when the correlation analysis included data from one site with a density of 830 plants/m2.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidbushy wallflower, Erysimum repandum L. # ERYRElaciniata cutleaf eveningprimrose, Oenothera laciniata Hill # OEOLAhenbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. # LAMAMhard red winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Chlorsulfuron2,4-DERYRELAMAMOEOLA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 594 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:724–730.Google Scholar
2. Harvey, J. J. 1985. Control of Poa spp. in winter cereals—is it worthwhile? Aspects Appl. Biol. 9:117–128.Google Scholar
3. Klingaman, T. E. and Peeper, T. F. 1989. Weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with chlorsulfuron and CGA 131036 and comparison of modes of action. Weed Technol. 3:490–496.Google Scholar
4. McCoy, D. 1976. Roadside Flowers of Oklahoma. C & J Printing Co., Lawton, Oklahoma. p. 19–20.Google Scholar
5. Scott, R. C. and Peeper, T. F. 1994. Economic returns from spring broadleaf weed control in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 8:797–806.Google Scholar
6. Swenson, J. B., Thill, D. C., and Callihan, R. C. 1986. Broadleaf weed control in spring barley at Potlatch, Idaho. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 347 p.Google Scholar
7. Webb, F. J. and Johnson, Q. R. 1987. Herbicide performance in conventional and no-till small grains. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:49–54.Google Scholar
8. Wells, G. J. 1979. Annual weed competition in wheat crops: the effect of weed density and applied nitrogen. Weed Res. 19:185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1965. Use of 2,4-D on winter wheat. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. 1860. 2 p.Google Scholar