Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:21:06.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wine Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Drift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib ,
Robert Parker  and
E. Patrick Fuerst
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
N.W. Res. Cent., Wash. State Univ. Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
Robert Parker
Affiliation:
N.W. Res. Cent., Wash. State Univ. Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
N.W. Res. Cent., Wash. State Univ. Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, bromoxynil, 2,4-D, glyphosate, and a combination of 2,4-D plus glyphosate were applied on newly planted and established ‘Lemberger’ wine grape at 1/3, 1/10, 1/33, and 1/100 of the maximum labelled rate in wheat or fallow to simulate exposure to drifted herbicides. All herbicides produced symptoms on grape but the most severe symptoms were with 2,4-D and the least severe with bromoxynil. Newly planted grape was more sensitive to herbicides than established grape. Although established grape recovered from injury caused by all treatments except 2,4-D and the highest rate of chlorsulfuron and glyphosate, newly planted grape recovered only from lower rates of bromoxynil. All herbicides resulted in diagnostic symptoms, but other symptoms were very similar to those caused by other stresses.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrilechlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamideglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinethifensulfuron, 3[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acid2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidgrape, Vitis vinifera L.Crop injuryherbicide symptomsbromoxynilchlorsulfuronglyphosatethifensulfuron2,4-D
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, D. F., Jackson, C. M., and Bamesberger, W. L. 1964. Quantitative studies of 2,4-D esters in the air. Weeds 12:280–283.Google Scholar
2. Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1991. Foliar absorption and translocation of herbicides from aqueous solution and herbicide-treated soil. Weed Sci. 40:281–287.Google Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Clore, W. J. 1972. 2,4-D on Concord grapes. Wash. State Grape Soc. Proc. Grandview, WA. p. 29–32.Google Scholar
5. Farwell, S. O., Robinson, E., Powell, W. J., and Adams, D. F. 1976. Survey of airborne 2,4-D in south-central Washington. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 26:224–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Gärtel, W. 1988. Nutritional disorders. p. 64–66. Pearson, R. C. and Goheen, A C., eds. Compendium of Grape Diseases. APS Press. St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
7. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. p. 609–615 in Applied Linear Statistical Models, Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
8. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Ahmedullah, A. M., and Wright, G. M. 1991. Influence of repeated application of 2,4-D on yield and juice of Concord grapes (Vitis labruscana). Weed Sci. 39:284–295.Google Scholar
9. Robinson, E. and Fox, L. L. 1978. 2,4-D herbicides in central Washington. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28:1015–1020.Google Scholar
10. Van Andel, O. M., Van der Zweep, W., and Goter, C. J. 1976. Morphogenetic responses of plants. p. 127–163 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides—Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Weaver, R. J., Leonard, O. A., and McCune, S. B. 1961. Response of Tokay grapes to spray applications of 2,4-D. Hilgardia 31:419–433.Google Scholar