Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:01:09.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Interference with Seedling Growth of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne): Influence of Density and Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Inderjit ,
Maria Olofsdotter  and
Jens C. Streibig
Inderjit
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Punjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
Maria Olofsdotter
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Weed Science, Agrovej 10, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
Jens C. Streibig*
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Weed Science, Agrovej 10, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction between wheat and perennial ryegrass seed density and seedlings of different ages was studied under controlled conditions. Root length of perennial ryegrass, after sowing, was suppressed by wheat and was dependent on the density of wheat seeds. Shoot growth of perennial ryegrass, however, was unaffected by the presence of wheat. Perennial ryegrass density had no effect on the first 2 wk of wheat seedling growth. The age of wheat seedlings had no appreciable influence on either root or shoot growth of perennial ryegrass. The present study highlights the need for an unbiased two-way experimental design to identify the dominant competitor.

Keywords

Perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne L. # LOLPEwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Allelopathycompetitive abilityANOVAanalysis of variance
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 807 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andreasen, C. 1990. The Occurrence of Weed Species in Danish Arable Fields. Ph.D. dissertation. Denmark: KVL University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Brewster, B. D. 1992. Seeding arrangement on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield and interaction with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Technol. 6: 820–823.Google Scholar
Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64: 321–325.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. D. and Mokhtari, S. 1998. Seasonal and site variability in the tolerance of wheat cultivars to interference from Lolium rigidum . Weed Res. 38: 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenzi, W. D. and McCalla, T. M. 1962. Inhibition of germination and seedling development by crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26: 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenzi, W. D., McCalla, T. M., and Norstadt, F. A. 1967. Presence and persistence of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn and sorghum residues. Agron. J. 59: 163–165.Google Scholar
Gussin, E. J. and Lynch, J. M. 1981. Microbial fermentation of grass residues to organic acids as a factor in the establishment of new grass swords. New Phytol. 89: 449–457.Google Scholar
Hamidi, B. A., Inderjit, , Striebig, J. C., and Olofsdotter, M. 2001. Laboratory bioassay for phytotoxicity: an example from wheat straw. Agron. J. 93: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashem, A., Radosevich, S. R., and Roush, M. L. 1998. Effect of proximity factor on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, D. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1978. Plant competition for atrazine. Weed Sci. 26: 94–99.Google Scholar
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. III, and Pons, T. L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. Berlin: Springer. 567 p.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1983. Inhibition of morning-glory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.) and certain other weed species by phytotoxic components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 1,027–1,043.Google Scholar
Martinez, J. and Guiraud, G. 1990. A lysimeter study of the effects of a ryegrass catch crop, during a winter/maize rotation on nitrate leaching and on the following crop. J. Soil Sci. 41: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opoku, G., Vyn, T. J., and Voroney, R. P. 1997. Wheat straw placement effects on total phenolic compounds in soil and corn seedling growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77: 301–305.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interaction among crops and weed. Weed Technol. 1: 90–198.Google Scholar
Schumacher, W. J., Thill, D. C., and Lee, G. A. 1983. Allelopathic potential of wild oat (Avena fatua) on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 1,235–1,246.Google Scholar
Spruell, J. A. 1984. Allelopathic potential of wheat accessions. Dissertations Abstracts International, B Sciences and Engineering 45, 1102B.Google Scholar
Steinsiek, J. W., Oliver, L. R., and Collins, F. C. 1982. Allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw on selected weed species. Weed Sci. 30: 495–497.Google Scholar
Stone, M. J., Cralle, H. T., Chandler, J. M., Miller, T. D., Bovey, R. W., and Carson, K. H. 1998. Above- and belowground interference of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46: 438–441.Google Scholar
Thijs, H., Shann, J. R., and Weidenhamer, J. D. 1994. The effect of phytotoxins on competitive outcome in a model system. Ecology 75: 1,959–1,964.Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, J. D., Hartnett, D. C., and Romeo, J. T. 1989. Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 613–624.Google Scholar
Weisberg, S. 1985. Applied Linear Regression. 2nd ed. London: J. Wiley. 344 p.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A., Harmon, R., and Mueller, S. 1989. Allelopathic potential of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sudex). J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1,855–1,865.Google Scholar
Winkle, M. E., Leavitt, J.R.C., and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Effects of weed density on herbicide absorption and bioactivity. Weed Sci. 29: 405–409.Google Scholar