Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:01:23.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed-Crop Responses to Weed Management Systems in Conservation Tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Benjamin Coffman
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
J. Ray Frank
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Frederick, MD 21702

Abstract

Continuous corn was grown for 5 consecutive yr using conservation tillage methods in the Maryland Piedmont. Herbicide treatments were applied annually at common usage rates and were compared for their effects on weed cover, species stability, and grain production. Weed flora dominance shifted from giant foxtail the first year to smooth pigweed the following year. Smooth pigweed then dominated the flora for the duration of the study. Horsenettle was ubiquitous in all treatments but never became competitive. Canada thistle occurred in measurable densities in all plots that had not received atrazine applied preemergence. Grain yields were correlated negatively with densities of smooth pigweed in 1983 (r = −0.58, P = 0.01), and Canada thistle in 1983 and 1984 (r = −0.63 and −0.62, respectively; P = 0.05). Grain yields were correlated positively with midseason precipitation (r = 0.85, P = 0.01).

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1981. Identification of triazine-resistant Amaranthus spp. Weed Sci. 29:345348.Google Scholar
2. Carson, A. G., and Bandeen, J. D. 1975. Chemical control of Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 23:116118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chancellor, R. J. 1979. The long-term effects of herbicides on weed populations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 91:141144.Google Scholar
4. Doub, J. P., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1988. Consecutive annual applications of alachlor and metolachlor to continuous no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:340344.Google Scholar
5. Haas, H., and Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. p. 5759 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
6. Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1989. Control of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 3:136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. p. 217224 in The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology, Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, W. C. III, and Coble, H. D. 1986. Crop rotation and herbicide effects on the population dynamics of two annual grasses. Weed Sci. 34:452456.Google Scholar
9. McAllister, R. S., and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Translocation of 14C-glyphosate and 14CO2- labeled photoassimilates in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126128.Google Scholar
11. Parochetti, J. V. 1974. Canada thistle control with atrazine. Weed Sci. 22:2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Radosevich, S. R., and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology; Implications for Vegetative Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 39.Google Scholar
13. Triplett, G. B., and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453457.Google Scholar
14. Worsham, A. D., and Lewis, W. M. 1985. Weed management: Key to no-tillage crop production. p. 177188 in Hargrove, W. L., Boswell, F. C., and Langdall, G. W., eds. Proc. South. Region No-Till Conf. Google Scholar