Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:55:45.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Management Programs in Potato (Solanum tuberosum) with Rimsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Ackley
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420

Abstract

Weed management programs in ‘Superior’ potato with PRE and POST rimsulfuron treatments were investigated during 1992, 1993, and 1994 in Virginia on a State sandy loam soil. Common ragweed control by PRE combinations of metolachlor with linuron or metribuzin was higher when treatments included PRE or POST rimsulfuron. Common lambsquarters control was 93 to 96% by treatments that included POST rimsulfuron. In the absence of PRE herbicides, POST applications of 35 g ai/ha rimsulfuron plus 280 g ai/ha metribuzin controlled weeds comparable to sequential applications of this combination. Potato recovered from occasional terminal leaf chlorosis caused by rimsulfuron, rimsulfuron plus metribuzin, and organophosphate insecticides combined POST with rimsulfuron plus metribuzin. These studies demonstrate that rimsulfuron can be a useful component of weed management programs that include metolachlor, linuron, and metribuzin.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1995. Rimsulfuron in potatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:111.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, W. H., 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524528.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1991. United States standards for grades of potatoes. FR Doc. 91–4381. 7 p.Google Scholar
4. Blackshaw, R. E., Lynch, D. R., and Entz, T. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron and HOE-075032. Weed Technol. 9:228235.Google Scholar
5. Christopher, J. T., Preston, C., and Powles, S. P. 1994. Malathion antagonizes metabolism-based chlorsulfuron resistance in Lolium rigidum . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 49:172182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cranshaw, W. S., and Thornton, M. K. 1988. Effects of systemic insecticides on potato growth and their interaction with metribuzin. Am. Potato J. 65:535541.Google Scholar
7. Dallyn, S. L., 1971. Weed control methods in potatoes. Am. Potato. J. 48:116128.Google Scholar
8. Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428435.Google Scholar
9. Freisen, G. H., and Wall, D. A. 1986. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 32:442444.Google Scholar
10. Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., Callihan, R. H., and Dwelle, R. B. 1985. Metribuzin absorption, translocation, and distribution in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Sci. 33:629634.Google Scholar
11. Green, J. M., and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactant structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7:633640.Google Scholar
12. Hatterman-Valenti, H., Lawson, V. F., and Owen, M.D.K. 1994. Interaction of metribuzin and phorate on ‘Atlantic’ and ‘Norchip’ potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Technol. 8:461464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Henne, R. C., 1975. Potato variety response to metribuzin. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:300303.Google Scholar
14. Kapusta, G., and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:9991003.Google Scholar
15. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (lea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:3036.Google Scholar
16. Nandihalli, U. B., and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Toxicity, absorption, and translocation of soil-applied imazaquin in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 36:411416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Reddy, K. N., and Bendixen, L. E. 1989. Toxicity, absorption, and translocation of soil-applied chlorimuron in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 37:147151.Google Scholar
18. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1990. Low-rate applications of herbicides in conventional and reduced tillage potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 4:509513.Google Scholar
19. Vencill, W. K., J. S. Richburg, III, Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON-12037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148152.Google Scholar
20. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 239241.Google Scholar