Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:28:57.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Lactofen Plus Chlorimuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. Roy Vidrine
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Res. Stn., 8105 E. Campus, Alexandria, LA 71302
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted over a 3-yr period at three locations to evaluate lactofen at rates of 110 to 220 g ai ha−1 applied POST in combination with chlorimuron at 9 g ae ha−1 for weed control in soybean. At St. Joseph in 1989 and Baton Rouge in 1990, lactofen at 110, 150, and 170 g ha−1 in combination with chlorimuron controlled prickly sida (3 to 5 cm) and entireleaf and pitted morningglory (5 to 13 cm) comparable with the full rate of lactofen at 220 g ha−1 plus chlorimuron and the standard treatment of acifluorfen at 280 g ae ha−1 plus bentazon at 560 g ae ha−1. Entireleaf morningglory and sicklepod control at Alexandria with lactofen at 110 to 170 g ha−1 plus chlorimuron was comparable with that from the full rate of lactofen plus chlorimuron and better than with acifluorfen plus bentazon. Weed control was reduced when soil moisture was deficient at treatment time or when prickly sida height was more than 5 cm and entireleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, and sicklepod more than 15 cm. In related studies at St. Joseph, a reduced rate of lactofen (170 g ha−1) in combination with chlorimuron controlled prickly sida 98%, pitted morningglory 93%, and entireleaf morningglory 90% in 1988, which was comparable with the control from the full rate of lactofen plus chlorimuron and with acifluorfen plus bentazon.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Tripp, T. N. 1983. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in soybeans (Glycine max) with foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31:628633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Minimum effective rate of chlorimuron and imazaquin applied to common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Technol. 3:126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365374.Google Scholar
4. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 24:224228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: Spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929931.Google Scholar
7. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., and Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Imazethapyr for postemergence weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:56.Google Scholar
8. Hagwood, H. B., Nichols, R. L., Bates, M. R., and Trammell, C. A. 1988. Label summary for use of lactofen in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:70.Google Scholar
9. Jeffery, L. S., Connell, J., McCutchen, T., and Overton, J. R. 1976. Response of prickly sida (Sida spinosa) and soybeans (Glycine max) to various herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:202205.Google Scholar
10. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Application rate and timing of acifluorfen, bentazon, chlorimuron, and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:526534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Major, C. S. 1992. Addressing public fears over pesticides. Weed Technol. 6:471472.Google Scholar
12. Moore, J. D., Banks, P. A., and Pinnell-Allison, C. L. 1990. Wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 38:536540.Google Scholar
13. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1985. Susceptibility of five species of the Solanum nigrum complex to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:386390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shaw, D. R. and Wixson, M. B. 1991. Postemergence combinations of imazaquin or imazethapyr with AC 263,222 for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:644649.Google Scholar
15. Steckel, L. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541545.Google Scholar
16. Walker, R. H., Jolley, E. R., McGuire, J. A., and Murray, D. S. 1982. Benazolin and admixtures for common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:5053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., and Hagwood, H. B. 1990. Lactofen systems for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 4:819823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar