Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:18:13.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Low-Tannin Seedling Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Glenn Wehtje ,
Robert H. Walker  and
James D. Jones Jr.
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412
Robert H. Walker*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412
James D. Jones Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to evaluate weed control and crop safety with postemergence-applied herbicides in two cultivars of low-tannin seedling sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata). Two applications of either 2,4-D amine at 0.28 kg ae/ha or 2,4-DB amine at 0.56 kg ae/ha controlled sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) ≥ 90%. Equivalent control of smallflower morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia) required either two applications of 2,4-D or three of 2,4-DB. Three applications of either herbicide were required for comparable spotted spurge (Euphorbia maculata) control. Sericea lespedeza was not adversely affected when either herbicide was applied up to three times per season over two consecutive seasons. Tolerance to 2,4-D and 2,4-DB was equal between two sericea lespedeza cultivars. Absorption of foliar-applied 14C-2,4-D was greater in sicklepod and smallflower morningglory than in sericea lespedeza. Translocation of absorbed 14C-2,4-D was equivalent between sicklepod and sericea lespedeza but greater in smallflower morningglory than in sericea lespedeza. Absorption and translocation of foliar-applied 14C-2,4-DB was equivalent between sicklepod and sericea lespedeza. Furthermore, 14C-2,4-DB absorption was less in smallflower morningglory than in sericea lespedeza.

Keywords

Amine salt of 2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidamine salt of 2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb. #IAQTAspotted spurge, Euphorbia maculata L. # EPHMAsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOBsericea lespedeza, Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don.Absorptiontranslocation2,4-D2,4-DBimazaquinfomesafen14C-2,4-D14C-2,4-DBCASOBEPHMAIAQTADAP, days after plantingPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 290 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of third author: Henry County Activities Building, Route 1 Box 120, Headland, AL 36345.

References

Literature Cited

Donnelly, E. D. 1965. Serala sericea. Crop Sci. 5:605.Google Scholar
Donnelly, E. D. 1981. Registration of AU Lotan sericea lespedeza. Crop Sci. 21:474.Google Scholar
Donnelly, E. D. and Anthony, W. B. 1973. Relationship of sericea lespedeza leaf and stem tannin to forage quality. Agron. J. 65:993–994.Google Scholar
Fang, S. C. 1958. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D-1-C14 in pea and tomato. Weeds 6:179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeker, J. and Steen, R. 1971. Hydroxylation of 2,4-D in several weed species. Weed Sci. 19:507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawf, L. R. and Behrens, R. 1974. Selectivity factors in response of plants to 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22:244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, C. A. 1951. Lespedeza. In Hughes, H. D., Heath, M. E., and Metcalfe, D. S., eds. Forages, the Science of Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press. pp. 190–203.Google Scholar
Holly, K. 1964. Herbicide selectivity in relation to formulation and application methods. In Audits, L. J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. London: Academic Press. pp. 423–464.Google Scholar
Hoveland, C. S. and Anthony, W. B. 1974. Cutting management of sericea lespedeza for forage and seed. Agron. J. 66:189–191.Google Scholar
Hoveland, C. S. and Donnelly, E. D. 1985. The lespedezas. In Heath, M. E., Barnes, R. F., and Metcalfe, D. S., eds. Forages, the Science of Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press. pp. 128–135.Google Scholar
Hoveland, C. S., Buchanan, G. A., and Donnelly, E. D. 1971. Establishment of sericea lespedeza. Weed Sci. 19:21–24.Google Scholar
Ketchersid, M. L., Boswell, T. E., and Merkle, M. G. 1978. Effect of 2,4-DB on yield and pod development of peanuts. Peanut Sci. 5:35–39.Google Scholar
McGraw, R. L. and Hoveland, C. S. 1995. Lespedezas. In Barnes, R. F., Miller, D. A., and Nelson, C. J., eds. Forages, An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Volume 1. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press. pp. 261–271.Google Scholar
Mosjidis, J. A. 1990. Daylength and temperature effects of emergence and early growth of sericea lespedeza. Agron. J. 82:923–926.Google Scholar
Mosjidis, J. A. and Donnelly, E. D. 1989. Registration of ‘AU Donnelly’ sericea lespedeza. Crop Sci. 29:237–238.Google Scholar
Stitt, R. E. 1939. The response of lespedeza to lime and fertilizer. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 31:520–527.Google Scholar
Wathana, S., Corbin, F. T., and Waldrep, T. W. 1972. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-DB in soybean and cocklebur. Weed Sci. 20:120–123.Google Scholar