Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:58:50.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Field Corn (Zea mays) with RPA 201772 Combinations with Atrazine and S-Metolachlor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah Taylor-Lovell  and
Loyd M. Wax
Sarah Taylor-Lovell*
Affiliation:
Invasive Weed Management Research, USDA-ARS, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Invasive Weed Management Research, USDA-ARS, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The premix atrazine + S-metolachlor is commonly used to control a wide range of weeds in corn, but it is weak on velvetleaf and several other broadleaf species. RPA 201772, used at reduced rates in combination with atrazine + S-metolachlor, may improve the weed control spectrum. In field studies at Urbana and Dekalb in 1998 and 1999, RPA 201772 was combined with a premix of atrazine at 1,820 g ai/ha and S-metolachlor at 1,408 g ai/ha to compare RPA 201772 rate effects on corn injury, weed control, and yield. RPA 201772 was applied at 0, 26, 53, 78, 105, and 132 g ai/ha early preplant (EPP), preplant incorporated (PPI), and preemergence (PRE). Compared with atrazine + S-metolachlor alone, RPA 201772 combinations did not improve giant foxtail control. However, RPA 201772 at 26 or 53 g/ha increased control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, ivyleaf morningglory, common ragweed, giant ragweed, and velvetleaf in some environments. At Urbana in both years, RPA 201772 at 26 g/ha in combination with atrazine + S-metolachlor increased velvetleaf control 15% compared with the premix alone. RPA 201722 at 26 to 78 g/ha decreased velvetleaf densities with all application methods. Greater weed control and higher corn yield occurred in treatments applied PRE or PPI compared with EPP applications, except where conditions were dry after PRE applications. This research demonstrates the benefit of RPA 201772 at low rates for broadleaf weed control with less potential for crop injury compared with high RPA 201772 rates.

Keywords

RPA 201772 (proposed common name, isoxaflutole), 5-cyclopropyl isoxazol-4-yl-2-mesyl-4-trifluoromethylphenyl ketonecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBELgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAgiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. # AMBTRivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHEredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus # ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L.HPPD inhibitorisoxaflutolereduced herbicide ratesDAE, days after emergenceDAT, days after treatmentEPP, early preplantPPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 249 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D. 1991. Early preplant atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5: 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curvey, S. E. and Kapusta, G. 1996. Corn weed control with preemergence RPA 201772. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 53: 450–451.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Efficacy of isoxaflutole alone and in combinations in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:81.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1998. Efficacy of isoxaflutole with acetamide herbicides in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53: 76–77.Google Scholar
Hartwig, G. A., Vrabel, T. E., and Williams, C. B. 1997. 1997 EUP results for isoxaflutole in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:79.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Defelice, M. S., and Holman, C. S. 1997. Application timing affects weed control with metolachlor plus atrazine in no-till corn. Weed Technol. 11: 207–211.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Sizzema, P. H., Tardif, F., Hamill, A. S., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 1998. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of RPA 201772 for preemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 12: 670–676.Google Scholar
Loubiere, P., Millet, J. C., and Fleury, P. 1996. The significance of RPA201772 for pre-emergence weed control in maize. Seizieme conference du Columa. Journees internationales sur la lutte contre les mauvaises herbes, Reims, France. Dec. 6-8, 1996. Tome 1. pp. 491–496.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M. and Pallett, K. E. 1996. RPA 201772 for weed control in maize. Pestic. Outlook. pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Vrabel, T. E., Paulsgrove, M. D., Cramp, S., Cain, P., Gamblin, A., and Millet, J. C. 1994. RPA 201772: A new broad spectrum preemergence herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 57.Google Scholar
Mosier, D. G., Simkins, G. S., Striegel, W. L., and Wrucke, M. A. 1997. Efficacy of isoxaflutole premixes applied preplant or preemergence in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 78–79.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., Slack, C. H., Martin, J. R., and Witt, W. W. 1995. Evaluations of EXP31130A—A new preemergence corn herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 25–26.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62: 113–124.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Veerasekaran, P., and Viviani, F. 1997. Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase: The mode of action of the herbicide RPA 201772 (isoxaflutole). Pestic. Sci. 50: 83–84.Google Scholar
Simkins, G. S., Wrucke, M. A., Mosier, D. G., and Hicks, C. P. 1997. Control of common cocklebur, giant ragweed, and common sunflower with preemergence applications of isoxaflutole in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 12–13.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1997. Effect of application timing on corn tolerance and weed control with isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:13.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1998. Preemergence weed control and corn tolerance in conventional and no-tillage corn with isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38: 1.23.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L. and Penner, D. 1998. Basis for differential corn tolerance of four corn hybrids to isoxaflutole. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53: 94.Google Scholar
Vrabel, T. E., Jensen, J. O., Wrucke, M. A., and Hicks, C. 1995. EXP31130A: A new preemergent herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 24–25.Google Scholar
Wrucke, M. A., Simkins, G. S., and Veilleux, D. P. 1997. Effect of cultivation on performance of isoxaflutole in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:17.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1998. Performance of preemergence applications of isoxaflutole in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38: 1.24.Google Scholar