Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:24:17.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control and Economics in Nontransgenic and Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Kelly J. Bryant  and
Larry D. Earnest
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Southeast Research and Extension Center, Monticello, AR 71656
Kelly J. Bryant
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Southeast Research and Extension Center, Monticello, AR 71656
Larry D. Earnest
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Southeast Research and Extension Center, Monticello, AR 71656
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted in 1996 and 1997 near Rohwer, AR, to evaluate weed control with standard herbicide programs in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) compared with glyphosate-based herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Total postemergence (POST) programs containing 0.84 kg ae/ha glyphosate 14 d after emergence (DAE) followed by 0.42 kg/ha at 42 DAE controlled pitted and entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa and I. hederacea var. integriuscula) 80 to 83%. This control was lower than with any other weed control program in the study. All glyphosate containing herbicide programs controlled barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) at least 94%. Soybean injury was 8% or less for all herbicide treatments except for ‘Hartz 5088 Roundup Ready’ treated with pendimethalin plus chlorimuron and metribuzin preplant incorporated (PPI) followed by glyphosate or acifluorfen plus bentazon 42 DAE. All weed control and soybean injury ratings were similar at 24 d after the 42 DAE application (DAA) when compared with the 10 DAA rating. Two weed control programs with ‘Northrup King S-59-60’ soybean using standard herbicide programs yielded 3,015 and 3,070 kg/ha, and net returns were $92.20/ha and $122.82/ha, respectively. Two production systems containing the Hartz 5088 Roundup Ready cultivar had positive net returns of $35.11/ha and $39.49/ha.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGpitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA)ECHCGIPOHGIPOLADAA, days after the 42 d after emergence applicationDAE, days after emergenceEPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (E.C. 2.5.1.19)H 5088 RR, Hartz 5088 Roundup ReadyNK S-59-60, Northrup King S-59-60POST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergenceUAN, 28% urea ammonium nitrate
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 586 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of first author: Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

References

Literature Cited

Arkansas Agricultural Statistics Service. 1996. Arkansas Agricultural Statistics for 1995. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Rep. Ser. 334. 51 p.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. C., Shaw, D. R., and Medlin, C. R. 1998. Roundup Ready® programs versus conventional programs: efficacy, varietal performance, and economics. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:272–273.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Bailey, W. A., and Wilcut, J. W. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:4.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 1995. Weed control in Roundup tolerant soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:46.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. C., Shaw, D. R., and Schraer, S. M. 1998. Effect of conventional herbicide programs and irrigation on glyphosate-tolerant soybean yield. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:270–271.Google Scholar
Clay, P. A., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) control programs in Roundup Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:49–50 Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35:1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage development descriptions for soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 17:913–917.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Massey, R. E., Defelice, M. S., and Becker, C. D. 1997. Weed control and economic returns with postemergence herbicides in narrow-row soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 11:453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., and Hart, S. E. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate- and glufosinate-tolerant corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:5.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, J. W., Dotray, P. A., Jones, C. L., and Sunderland, S. L. 1996. Postemergence weed management in Roundup Ready cotton for the Texas southern high plains. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:52–53.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10:957–962.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:12–21.Google Scholar
Madsen, K. H. 1993. Weed control in glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:16.Google Scholar
Miller, D. K., Milligan, J. L., and Wilson, C. F. 1998. Evaluation of reduced rate preemergence herbicides in Roundup Ready soybean weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:271–272.Google Scholar
Shah, D. M., Horsch, R. B., Klee, H. J., et al. 1986. Engineering herbicide tolerance in transgenic plants. Science 233:478–481.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H. and Spratlin, C. E. 1995. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:39–40.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Shaw, D. R., and Murphy, G. P. 1996. The potential of a total postemergence weed control program for Roundup-Ready soybean. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:1.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Beaty, J. D., and Baldwin, F. L. 1997. Weed control systems for Roundup Ready® cotton. In Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conf., New Orleans, LA. January 6–10, 1997. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. pp. 785–786.Google Scholar
Windham, T. E. and Brown, C. D. 1996. Estimating 1997 production costs in Arkansas: soybeans, furrow irrigated, mixed soils. Univ. Arkansas Coop. Ext. Ser. AG-460-10-96. 4 p.Google Scholar
York, A. C. 1995. Weed management with Roundup-Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:34–35.Google Scholar