Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:36:26.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation and Inheritance of Isoxaflutole Tolerance in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph T. Simmons  and
James J. Kells
Joseph T. Simmons
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corn injury from isoxaflutole has been reported in sites across the corn belt, and variation in tolerance to isoxaflutole has been observed among corn hybrids. Greenhouse trials were conducted to study the variation and the inheritance of isoxaflutole tolerance in corn. Inbred lines from two families were treated with isoxaflutole applied preemergence, at four times the typical use rate, to study plant response. Plant height of corn inbreds treated with isoxaflutole compared with the untreated control ranged from 47 to 96% among eight lines within the B73 family and from 54 to 97% among six lines within the C103 family. One tolerant and one sensitive inbred line were selected from each family. The inbred lines were crossed in the field to produce four F1 hybrids. The four hybrids were treated with isoxaflutole in the greenhouse, and the tolerance of each hybrid was compared with the parent inbred lines. Data indicate that sensitivity to isoxaflutole is a heritable trait that is mediated by nuclear genes. Tolerance of corn hybrids to isoxaflutole can be predicted from the response of the parent inbreds.

Keywords

Isoxaflutole (5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl) isoxazole)corn, Zea mays L.
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 177 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C., Kushwaha, S., and Mitra, S. 1999. Response of various weed species and corn (Zea mays) to RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 504–509.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41: 508–516.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1994. Response of maize (Zea mays) inbreds and hybrids to rimsulfuron. Pestic. Sci. 40: 187–191.Google Scholar
Kang, M. S. 1993. Inheritance of susceptibility to nicosulfuron herbicide in maize. J. Hered. 84: 216–217.Google Scholar
Klein, R. N., Wicks, G. A., Wilson, R. G., Martin, A. R., Roeth, F. W., and Knezevic, S. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska: application. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 54: 82–83.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Vrabel, T. E., Paulsgroves, M. D., Cramp, S., Cain, P., Gamblin, A., and Millet, J. C. 1994. RPA 201772: a new broad spectrum PRE herbicide for corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 57–58.Google Scholar
Narsaiah, D. B. and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Differential responses of corn inbreds and hybrids to alachlor. Crop Sci. 17: 657–659.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., Slack, C. H., Martin, J. R., and Witt, W. W. 1995. Evaluations of EXP31130A—a new preemergence corn herbicide. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 25.Google Scholar
Penner, D., Roggenbuck, F. C., and Rossman, E. C. 1986. Tolerance of corn inbreds and hybrids to the herbicide trifluralin. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 41: 155–159.Google Scholar
Rowe, L. and Penner, D. 1990. Factors affecting choloracetanilide injury to corn. Weed Technol. 4: 904–906.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999a. Weed control and corn (Zea mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 713–725.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1999b. Physiological basis for tolerance of four Zea mays hybrids to RPA 201772. Weed Sci. 47: 631–635.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Klein, R. N., Wilson, R. G., Roeth, F. W., Knezevic, S., and Martin, A. R. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska: soils. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 54: 73–82.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W. and Dowler, C. D. 1995. Sensitivity of selected field corn inbreds (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 9: 779–782.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Wicks, G. A., Klein, R. N., Roeth, F. W., Knezevic, S., and Martin, A. R. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska: environmental. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 54: 82.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1999. Preemergence weed control in conventional-till corn (Zea mays) with RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 471–477.Google Scholar