Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:15:02.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Utilization of Wheat Seed Rate to Manage Redstem Filaree (Erodium cicutarium) in a Zero-Tillage Cropping System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Greg P. Semach
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
John T. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 29, Beaverlodge, AB, Canada T0H 0C0
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

A field study was conducted to determine the effect of increasing seed rates of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) on redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) biomass and seed production and on wheat yield in a zero-tillage cropping system. Wheat was sown at 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 kg/ha in an experiment four consecutive years to determine annual and accumulated effects over time. Redstem filaree was most competitive with wheat when it emerged before or with wheat and when rainfall was plentiful during May and June. Redstem filaree biomass and seed production were markedly inhibited by drought conditions. An increase in wheat seed rate from 50 to 300 kg/ha reduced redstem filaree biomass and seed production by 53 to 95% over the years. There was little yield benefit to increasing the seed rate of weed-free wheat above 50 kg/ha. However, in the presence of redstem filaree, an increase in wheat seed rate from 50 to 300 kg/ha resulted in wheat yield being increased by 56 to 498%. Over four consecutive years, an increase in wheat seed rate from 50 to 300 kg/ha reduced redstem filaree in the soil seedbank by 79%. Higher seed rates of wheat can be an effective component of an improved program for redstem filaree management in conservation tillage cropping systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1992. Alberta Cereals and Oilseeds Crop Protection Survey. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 86 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. Crop Protection with Chemicals. Agdex 606-1. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. pp. 38239.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1989. A comparison of techniques for estimation of arable soil seedbanks and their relationship to weed flora. Weed Res. 29: 365373.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1992. Soil temperature, soil moisture, and seed burial effects on redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) emergence. Weed Sci. 40: 204207.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1993. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) density and row spacing effects on competition with green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 41: 403408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Entz, T. 1995. Day and night temperature effects on vegetative growth of Erodium cicutarium . Weed Res. 35: 471476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1998a. Redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) development and productivity under non-competitive conditions. Weed Technol. 12: 590594.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1998b. Erodium cicutarium density and duration of interference effects on yield of wheat, oilseed rape, pea, and dry bean. Weed Res. 38: 5562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brelsford, M., Maxwell, B., Stougaard, R., and Davis, E. 1994. The influence of barley and wild oat density on wild oat seed production at three locations in Montana. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 47: 7172.Google Scholar
Cardina, J. and Sparrow, D. H. 1996. A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci. 44: 4651.Google Scholar
Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition in spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33: 176181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107: 239252.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Holt, J. S., and Reints, J. S. 1989. Competitive interactions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oats (Avena fatua) grown at different densities. Weed Sci. 37: 538543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Orloff, S. B., and Adams, C. J. 1993. Improving weed control with 2,4-DB amine in seedling alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol. 7: 465470.Google Scholar
Evans, R. M., Thill, D. C., Thapia, L. S., Shafii, B., and Lish, J. M. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley grain yield. Weed Technol. 5: 3339.Google Scholar
Gallant, A. R. 1987. Nonlinear Statistical Models. New York: J. Wiley. 610 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, K. S., Arshad, M. A., and Moyer, J. R. 1997. Cultural control of weeds. In Pimental, D., ed. Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 237275.Google Scholar
Harmon, G. D. and Stamp, N. E. 1992. Effects of postdispersal seed predation on spatial inequality and size variability in an annual plant, Erodium cicutarium (Geraniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 300305.Google Scholar
Jedel, P. E. and Helm, J. H. 1995. Agronomic response to seeding rate of two- and six-rowed barley cultivars in central Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75: 315320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Weed management in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) in the absence of herbicides. J. Sustain. Agric. 3: 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafond, G. P. 1994. Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero-till management. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74: 703711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33: 498503.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Newman, J. C., Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., and McAndrew, D. W. 1999. Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference, shoot biomass and seed yield under zero tillage. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79: 655662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelaez, D. V., Busso, C. A., Elia, O. R., Pedorenko, D.E.F., and Fernandez, O. A. 1995. Demography and growth of Medicago minima and Erodium cicutarium: water stress effects. J. Arid Environ. 30: 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. J. 1990. Reproductive hierarchies in Erodium: effects of variation in plant density and rainfall distribution. Ecology. 71: 13161322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, Volume 2, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9: 218227.Google Scholar
Stephenson, D. W. 1992. Seed biology of some broadleaved weeds occurring in South Australia: a review. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Congr. 2: 488494.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5: 657663.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Wise, R. F., Frick, B. L., and Juras, L. T. 1995. Saskatchewan Weed Survey: Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 419 p.Google Scholar
Venter, H.J.T. and Verhoeven, R. L. 1990. The genus Erodium in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 1: 7992.Google Scholar