Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:18:22.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of southern highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars to saflufenacil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Ryan B. Aldridge ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
Sushila Chaudhari Open the ORCID record for Sushila Chaudhari [Opens in a new window] ,
David W. Monks ,
Wesley J. Everman  and
Lucky K. Mehra
Ryan B. Aldridge
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Sushila Chaudhari*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Wesley J. Everman
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Lucky K. Mehra
Affiliation:
Instructor, Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Sushila Chaudhari, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine tolerance of blueberry to saflufenacil. Greenhouse studies included five saflufenacil rates (0, 50, 100, 200, and 400 g ai ha−1) and three southern highbush blueberry cultivars (‘Legacy’, ‘New Hanover’, and ‘O’Neal’) and one rabbiteye blueberry cultivar (‘Columbus’). Saflufenacil treatments were soil applied into each pot when blueberry plants were approximately 30-cm tall. Visible injury (purpling/reddening of foliage and leaf abscission) ranged from 3% to 12%, 3% to 42%, 0% to 43%, and 0% to 29% with saflufenacil from 50 to 400 g ha−1 in Columbus, Legacy, New Hanover, and O’Neal, respectively, at 28 d after treatment. Regardless of injury, plant growth (change in height), soil plant analysis development, and whole-plant dry biomass of all cultivars did not differ among saflufenacil rates. Field studies were conducted in Burgaw, NC, to determine the tolerance of nonbearing (<3-yr-old and not mature enough to produce fruit) and bearing (>3-yr-old and mature enough to produce fruit) southern highbush blueberry (‘Duke’) to saflufenacil application at pre-budbreak or during the vegetative growth stage. Treatments included three rates of saflufenacil (50, 100, and 200 g ha−1), glyphosate (870 g ae ha−1), glufosinate (1096 g ai ha−1), glyphosate (870 g ha−1) + saflufenacil (50 g ha−1), glufosinate (1096 g ha−1) + saflufenacil (50 g ha−1), and hexazinone (1,120 g ai ha−1), applied POST-directed to the soil surface beneath blueberry plants in a 76-cm band on both sides of the blueberry planting row. The maximum injury from treatments containing saflufenacil was ≤11% in both nonbearing and bearing blueberry. No negative effects on plant growth or fruit yield were observed from any treatments. Results from both greenhouse and field studies suggest that saflufenacil applied at 50 (1X commercial use rate) and 100 g ha−1 is safe to use in blueberry.

Keywords

Bradley Hanson, University of California, DavisGlufosinateglyphosatehexazinonesaflufenacilhighbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L.rabbiteye blueberry, Vaccinium ashei ReadeInjuryleaf abscissionreddening foliagesmall fruit
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 475 - 480
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2011) Kixor™ herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation. 21 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2013) Treevix™ herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Ashigh, J, Hall, JC (2010) Bases for interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate in plants. J Agric Food Chem 58:7335–7343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basinger, NT, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Mitchem, WE, Chaudhari, S, Heitman, JL, Havlin, JL, Howard, AM, Spayd, SE (2018a) Vegetation-free strip width affects growth, berry composition, and yield of Cabernet Franc in vigorous growing environments. Catalyst: Discovery into Practice 2:15–23 Google Scholar
Basinger, NT, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Mitchem, WE, Perkins-Veazie, PM, Chaudhari, S (2018b) In-row vegetation-free strip width effect on established ‘Navaho’ blackberry. Weed Technol 32:85–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckelew, JK, Mitchem, WE, Chaudhari, S, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM (2018a) Evaluating weed control and response of newly planted peach trees to herbicides. Int J Fruit Sci 18:383–393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckelew, JK, Mitchem, WE, Monks, DW, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Mehra, LK (2018b) Effects of vegetation-free strip width and irrigation on newly planted peach. Int J Fruit Sci doi: 10.1080/15538362.2018.1545622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, NM, Gomes, LJP (2015) Selectivity of saflufenacil for sweet sorghum and potential use of Na-bentazon as a safener. Planta Daninha 33:267–274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaplane, KS, Mayer, DF (2001) Crop Pollination by Bees. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science. Pp 171–181 Google Scholar
Demchak, K, ed (2013) The Mid-Atlantic Berry Guide for Commercial Growers, 2013–2014. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Cooperative Extension. Pp 115–169 Google Scholar
Die, JV, Rowland, LJ (2013) Advent of genomics in blueberry. Mol Breed 32:493–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, SO, Lydon, J, Becerril, JM, Sherman, TD, Lehnen, LP, Matsumoto, H (1991) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 39:465–473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper, ND, ed., Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd edn. Westminster, CO: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Charvat, LD (2009) Dose responses of five broadleaf weeds to saflufenacil. Weed Technol 23:313–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalves, CG, Junior, ACDS, Pereira, MRR, Marchi, SR, Martins, D (2016) Selectivity of saflufenacil applied singly and in combination with glyphosate on coffee and citrus crops. Revista Caatinga 29:45–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/MOA.aspx?MOAID=12. Accessed: March 26, 2018Google Scholar
Hixson, AC (2008)Soil Properties Affect Simazine and Saflufenacil Fate, Behavior, and Performance. Ph.D dissertation. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. 242 pGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Ramirez, AHM, Singh, M (2013) Tank mixing saflufenacil, glufosinate, and indaziflam improved burndown and residual weed control. Weed Technol 27:422–429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krewer, G, Cline, B, NeSmith, DS (2015) Southeast Regional Blueberry Horticulture and Growth Regulator Guide. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. 15 p. http://www.smallfruits.org/assets/documents/ipm-guides/3_21_07SR_BlueberryHortGuide.pdf. Accessed: March 11, 2019Google Scholar
Liebl, RA, Walter, H, Bowe, SJ, Holt, TJ, Westberg, DE (2008)BAS 800H: a new herbicide for preplant burndown and preemergence dicot weed control. Page 120 in Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America. Chicago, IL: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Ballington, JR, Jordan, DL (2016) Weed control in Southern highbush blueberry with S-metolachlor, flumioxazin, and hexazinone. Int J Fruit Sci 16:150–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RT, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Kraus, TE, Sikkema, PH (2012) Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to saflufenacil. Can J Plant Sci 92:1319–1328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, TJ, Weller, SC, Ashton, FM (2002) Fruit and Nut Crops. Pages 484–499 in Monaco, TJ, Weller, SC, Ashton, FM, eds., Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 4th edn. New York: Wiley Google Scholar
[NCCE] North Carolina Cooperative Extension (2016) North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual 2016. Raleigh, NC. Pp 294–296 Google Scholar
Powles, S (2008) Evolved glyphosate resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360–365 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Retamales, JB, Hancock, JF (2012) Blueberry Pests, Their Management and Cultivar Resistance. Pages 231–266 in Retamales, JB, Hancock, JF, eds., Blueberries. 1st edn. Wallingford, UK: CAB International Google Scholar
Roberts, MM (2009)Biology and Control of Maryland Meadow Beauty (Rhexia mariana L.) in Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) in North Carolina. MS dissertation. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. 59 pGoogle Scholar
Roberts, MM, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2016) Response of the weed Maryland meadowbeauty (Rhexia mariana L.) and blueberry to flumioxazin PRE. Int J Fruit Sci 16:301–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, MM, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Burton, MG, Stowe, PS (2017) Seed biology of the weed Maryland meadowbeauty (Rhexia mariana L.) in blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Int J Fruit Sci 17:323–332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciarappa, WJ, Pavllis, GC (2004) Organic options for managing weeds in highbush blueberries. HortScience 39:831–832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M, Malik, M, Ramirez, AH, Jhala, AJ (2011) Tank mix of saflufenacil with glyphosate and pendimethalin for broad-spectrum weed control in Florida citrus. HortTechnology 21:606–615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strik, BC, Yarborough, D (2005) Blueberry production trends in North America, 1992 to 2003, and predictions for growth. HortTechnology 15:391–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service (2016) 2016 Blueberry Statistics. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_Jersey/Publications/Blueberry_Statistics/2016%20BLUEBERRYSUM.pdf. Accessed: November 16, 2018Google Scholar
Wu, L, Boyd, N (2012) Management of spreading dogbane (Apocynum androsaemifolium) in wild blueberry fields. Weed Technol 26:777–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar