Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:10:44.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synergism with Imazamox Co-applications for Red Rice Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Gustavo M. Teló ,
David C. Blouin ,
Benjamin M. McKnight  and
Eric A. Bergeron
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Professor, Postdoctoral Researcher, Research Associate, and Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Gustavo M. Teló
Affiliation:
Professor, Postdoctoral Researcher, Research Associate, and Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 45 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Professor, Postdoctoral Researcher, Research Associate, and Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric A. Bergeron
Affiliation:
Professor, Postdoctoral Researcher, Research Associate, and Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted at three locations in Louisiana to evaluate the interactions of imazamox at 44 g ai ha−1 mixed with propanil, thiobencarb, or with a prepackaged mixture of propanil plus thiobencarb. A synergistic response was observed for red rice control for all treatments at 14 days after treatments (DAT); however, at 21 DAT a neutral response was observed for imazamox mixed with propanil or thiobencarb. A synergistic response occurred for red rice control when imazamox was mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 3360 g ai ha−1 for all evaluation dates; however, imazamox mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 1680 g ha−1 resulted in synergism at the same evaluations except at 35 DAT with neutral response. Synergism was observed for barnyardgrass control with imazamox mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 3360 g ha−1 at 35 and 49 DAT. The only antagonism observed for barnyardgrass control was at 42 DAT with imazamox plus propanil at 840 and 1680 g ha−1 or mixed with the prepackage mixture at 1680 g ha−1. Rice treated with imazamox mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 3360 g ha−1 yielded 5770 kg ha−1.

Keywords

Propanilthiobencarbbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.red rice, Oryza sativa L.rice, Oryza sativa L.Antagonismneutral response
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 373 - 379
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Jason Bond, Mississippi State University

References

Literature Cited

Baltazar, AM, Smith, RJ Jr (1994) Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:575–581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2010) On a method of analysis for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 24:583–589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2004) Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using non-linear mixed model methodology. Weed Technol 18:464–472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisaka, H (1977) Weed damage to crops: yield loss due to weed competition. Pages 1–16 in Fryer JD and Matsunaka S, eds. Integrated Control of Weeds. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press Google Scholar
Carey, VF, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic response of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estorninos, LE, Gealy, DR, Gbur, EE, Talbert, RE, McClelland, MR (2005) Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes. Weed Sci 53:683–689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689–696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:29–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, JL, Cornelius, PL, Barrett, M (1988) Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby’s method. Weed Technol 2:304–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Wailes, EJ, Estorninos, EL, Chavez, RSC (2003) Rice cultivar differences in suppression of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and economics of reduced propanil rates. Weed Sci 51:601–609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Valverde, BE (2009) A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds. Pest Manag Sci 65:723–731 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hydrick, DE, Shaw, DR (1994) Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol 8:129–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzenbacher, FO, Kalsing, A, Dalazen, G, Markus, C, Merotto, A Jr (2015) Antagonism is the predominant effect of herbicide mixtures used for imidazolinone-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control. Planta Daninha 33:587–597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, SR, Perryman, SAM, Tatnell, LV (2007) Managing herbicide-resistant blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides): theory and practice. Weed Technol 21:300–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modeling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton. Weed Technol 25:335–343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barret, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicides resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2004) Potential use of imazethapyr mixtures in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 18:1037–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) Base SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2011) Base SAS 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Schmelzer, KR, Johnson, CS, Viant, MR, Williams, JF, Tjeerdema, RS (2005) Influence of organic carbon on reductive dechlorination of thiobencarb in California rice field soils. Pest Manag Sci 61:68–74 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaner, DL (2014). Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 372–374 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1961) 3,4-Dichloropropionanilide for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Weeds 9:318–322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1968) Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci 16:252–255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP (2014) Weed management. Pages 54–81 in Saichuk J, ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Pub 2321-5/14 revGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, ME, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Masson, JA (2001) Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci 49:652–657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Shaw, DR (1997) Potential stale seedbed herbicide combinations for cotton. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 216. p. 6 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Lanclos, DY, Geaghan, JP (2003) Effect of weed interference duration and weed-free period on glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:876–880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar