Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:56:29.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweetpotato tolerance to saflufenacil and rimsulfuron/thifensulfuron-methyl applied pretransplanting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Stephen L. Meyers Open the ORCID record for Stephen L. Meyers [Opens in a new window] ,
Mark W. Shankle  and
Trevor F. Garrett
Stephen L. Meyers*
Affiliation:
Assistant Extension/Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center-Pontotoc Ridge–Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA
Mark W. Shankle
Affiliation:
Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center-Pontotoc Ridge–Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA
Trevor F. Garrett
Affiliation:
Research Associate, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center-Pontotoc Ridge–Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stephen L. Meyers, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at the Pontotoc Ridge–Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station in Pontotoc, MS, in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato crop response to saflufenacil and rimsulfuron/thifensulfuron-methyl. Saflufenacil treatments consisted of a factorial of two rates (25 or 50 g ai ha–1) by three application timings [0, 3, or 6 wk before transplanting (WBP)]. Rimsulfuron/thifensulfuron-methyl treatments consisted of a factorial of two rates (18/18 or 35/35 g ai ha–1) by two application timings (3 or 6 WBP). A nontreated check was included for comparison. Saflufenacil resulted in as much as 20% stunting injury in 2016, but ≤4% crop injury in 2017. Compared to the nontreated check, saflufenacil did not reduce yield of any sweetpotato grade regardless of application rate or timing. Findings from this trial indicate that saflufenacil applied in pre-transplanting burndown and field preparation procedures did not have a negative impact on the subsequent sweetpotato crop and that the current plant-back interval (4 to 5 mo) may be excessive. Applications of rimsulfuron/thifensulfuron-methyl at 35/35 g ha–1 made 3 WBP resulted in significant crop injury but did not reduce yield of any sweetpotato grade. Findings from this trial suggest that rimsulfuron/thifensulfuron-methyl applications up to 35/35 g ha–1 applied at least 6 WBP and 18/18 g ha–1 applied at least 3 WBP had little impact on sweetpotato crop growth and may be a safe preplant burndown option.

Keywords

Peter J. Dittmar, University of FloridaRimsulfuronsaflufenacilthifensulfuron-methylsweetpotatoIpomoea batatas (L.) LamHerbicide toleranceplant-back interval
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 855 - 858
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2017a) LeadOff® herbicide product label. Wilmington, DE: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 14 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2017b) Sharpen® Powered by Kixor® herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, ND: BASF Corp. 31 pGoogle Scholar
Barkley, SL, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Meyers, SL, Monks, DW (2016) Fomesafen programs for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:506–515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, MB, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2016) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dose response to saflufenacil, saflufenacil plus glyphosate, and metribuzin plus saflufenacil plus glyphosate in soybean. Weed Sci 64:727–734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, PJ, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR (2013) Effects of halosulfuron POST on sweetpotato yield and storage root quality. Weed Technol 27:113–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper, ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: South Weed Sci Society Google Scholar
Kelly, ST, Shankle, MW, Miller, DK (2006) Efficacy and tolerance of flumioxazin on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol 20:334–339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, CH, Poston, DH, Hayes, RM, Montgomery, RF (2004) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi. Weed Technol 18:820–825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Monks, DW, Batts, RB, Thornton, AC (2007a) Sweetpotato tolerance to thifensulfuron applied postemergence. Weed Technol 21:928–931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Monks, DW, Batts, RB, Thornton, AC, Schultheis, JR (2007b) Sweetpotato tolerance to halosulfuron applied postemergence. Weed Technol 21:993–996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 27:463–467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2013) Herbicide-based weed management programs for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 27:331–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010) Evaluation of flumioxazin and S-metolachlor rate and timing for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 24:495–503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Shankle, MW (2016) Postemergence yellow nutsedge management in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:148–153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, LN, Mueller, TC, Main, CL, Bond, J, Steckel, LE (2011) Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technol 25:1–5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed. (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 403–404; 445–446Google Scholar
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture (2005) United States Standards for Grades of Sweet Potatoes. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] US Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2018) Quick Stats. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/D6E47E6B-D1A1-3ED9-8BC9-DBCE0F1AC692. Accessed: May 21, 2018Google Scholar