Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:48:19.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Hybrid Tolerance to Nicosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cathy A. Morton  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Cathy A. Morton
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wis., Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wis., Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tolerance of eight processing sweet corn hybrids to nicosulfuron was evaluated in field studies conducted at Arlington, Wis. in 1988 and 1989. Magnitude of sweet corn vigor reduction varied between years. Greater vigor reduction occurred to ‘Jubilee’ sweet corn than to the other seven hybrids. Injury to the hybrids increased as nicosulfuron rate increased. In 1988, some of the hybrids were stunted slightly by all of the herbicide rates, but within a hybrid there was no significant difference among herbicide rates. In 1989 none of the hybrids, including Jubilee, was stunted by even 140 g ai ha–1 nicosulfuron compared with the corresponding check. Effects of nicosulfuron on yields of the eight hybrids in 1988 and in 1989 are best described by a quadratic regression equation.

Keywords

Nicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidesweet corn, Zea mays L.Postemergence herbicidesulfonylurea
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 91 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea herbicides. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Dobrotka, M. J., Rowe, S. W., Wittsell, L. E., Erbes, D. L., Strachan, S. D., Flanigan, H. A., and Hanagan, M. A. 1988. DPX-V9360, a wide spectrum grass herbicide for postemergence use on corn. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Proc. 43:19.Google Scholar
3. Draper, N., and Smith, H. 1981. p. 1–69 in Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Eberlein, C. V., Rosow, K. M., Geadelmann, J. L., and Openshaw, S. J. 1989. Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. 37:651–657.Google Scholar
5. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Susceptibility of seven annual grasses to herbicides. Weed Res. 14:51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G. 1979. Serious new weed threat: wild proso millet. Crops Soils Mag. 31:10–13.Google Scholar
7. Harvey, R. G. 1990. Where do sulfonylurea herbicides fit? Proc. Wis. Fertilizer, AgLime and Pest Manage. Conf. 29:294–296.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G., and McNevin, G. R. 1990. Combining cultural practices and herbicides to control wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Technol. 4:433–439.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, W. G., Frans, R. E., McClelland, M. R., and Hathcock, P. J. 1989. Weed control and crop response to DPX-V9360-34 (Accent) in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:45.Google Scholar
10. Kuratle, H., Hanagan, M., Kenyon, W. H., and Strachan, S. D. 1988. DPX-V9360 – a new selective postemergence grass herbicide for corn. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:12–13.Google Scholar
11. Monks, D. W., and Johnson, K. E. 1989. Sweet corn response to Accent (DPX-V9360) and Beacon (CGA-136872). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:155.Google Scholar
12. Morton, C. A., and Harvey, R. G. 1988. DPX-V9360 for weed control in field and sweet corn. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Proc. 43:21.Google Scholar
13. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130–136.Google Scholar
14. Mueller, T. C., Bridges, D. C., and Banks, P. A. 1989. Postemergence johnsongrass control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:44.Google Scholar
15. Porpiglia, P. J., Gillespie, G. R., and Johnson, M. D. 1990 Enhanced CGA-136872 activity in combination with insecticides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:6.Google Scholar
16. Porpiglia, P. J., Rawls, E. K., Gillespie, G. R., and Peek, J. W. 1990. A method to evaluate the differential response of corn (Zea mays) to sulfonylureas. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:86.Google Scholar
17. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625–628.Google Scholar
18. Ritter, R. L., Kaufman, L. M., Monaco, T. J., Novitzky, W. P., and Moreland, D. E. 1989. Characterization of triazine-resistant giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and its control in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 37:591–595.Google Scholar
19. Sander, K. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Differential imazaquin tolerance and behavior in selected corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci. 37:290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Thompson, M. A., Witt, W. W., Martin, J. R., and Slack, C. H. 1989. Interaction effects of DPX-V9360 and organophosphate insecticides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:278.Google Scholar
21. Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics. 1990. Spencer, C. D., ed. Wis. Agric. Stat. Serv., P.O. Box 9160, Madison, WI 53715. p. 95.Google Scholar
22. Witt, W. W., and Slack, C. H. 1990. Interaction of DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 with soil applied insecticides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:6.Google Scholar