Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:25:45.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulfonylurea Herbicides Reduce Survival and Seed Production of Green and Yellow Foxtails (Setaria spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mohammad Khan  and
William W. Donald
Mohammad Khan
Affiliation:
Crop Weed Sci. Dep., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
William W. Donald
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Inst., Tarnab (Peshawar) NWFP, Pakistan, and Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Biosciences Res. Lab., Fargo U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agric. Engr., Univ. Mo., Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorsulfuron or metsulfuron applied POST at 10 g ai ha–1 at the four-leaf stage prevented yellow foxtail from forming seed, whereas seed production per pot was 53 to 77% of untreated checks following POST tribenuron or CGA-131036 treatments in greenhouse experiments. Chlorsulfuron applied POST at the two- and four-leaf stage severely reduced total seed production of yellow foxtail primarily by increasing plant mortality, rather than only reducing seed production per plant. Chlorsulfuron at 10 g ha–1 applied at the six- and eight-leaf stages decreased total seed production less than at the two earlier stages, by reducing both plant mortality and seed production per surviving plant. Yellow foxtail was much more susceptible than green foxtail to either chlorsulfuron or metsulfuron.

Keywords

CGA-131036, N-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl-amino-carbonyl)-2-(2-chloroethoxy)-benzenesulfonamidechlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamidemetsulfuron, 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidtribenuron, 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)methylamino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETVIyellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETLUCGA-131036chlorsulfuronmetsulfurontribenuronSetaria glaucaSetaria viridisSETLUSETVI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 284 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1976. Response of monocotyledons to HOE 22870 and HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ahrens, W. H., Cox, D. J., and Budhwar, G. 1990. Use of the arcsine and square root transformations for subjectively determined percentage data. Weed Sci. 38:452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chow, P.N.P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Causton, D. R., and Venus, J. C. 1981. The Biometry of Plant Growth. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
5. Day, R. W., and Quinn, G. P. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 59:433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Donald, W. W. 1990. Sulfonylurea herbicides. p. 423–476 in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
7. Donald, W. W., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1990. Northern Great Plains. p. 90–127 in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
8. Douglas, B. J., Thomas, A. G., Morrison, I. N., and Maw, M. G. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds, 70. Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Fay, P. K. 1990. A brief overview of the biology and distribution of weeds of wheat p. 33–50 in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, Ill. Google Scholar
10. Grafstrom, L. D. Jr., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Propanil + MCPA ester for foxtail control in wheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:49.Google Scholar
11. Hunter, J. H., Morrison, I. N., and Rourke, D.R.S. 1990. The Canadian Prairie Provinces. p. 51–90. in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
12. Jones, D., and Matloff, N. 1986. Statistical hypothesis testing in biology: a contradiction in terms. J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1156–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Miller, S. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1979. DPX-4189 (chlorsulfuron) for weed control in small grains and fallow. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34:37–39.Google Scholar
14. Morse, P. M., and Thompson, B. K. 1981. Presentation of experimental results. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:799–802.Google Scholar
15. Nalewaja, J. D., and Woznica, Z. 1985. Environment and chlorsulfuron phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 33:395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Perry, J. N. 1986. Multiple-comparison procedures: a dissenting view. J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail Weeds 11:139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Steel, M. G., Cavers, P. B., and Lee, S. M. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 59. Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv., and S. verticillata (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:711–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar