Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:06:15.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spring Glyphosate Application for Selective Control of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum L.) on Great Basin Rangelands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christo Morris ,
Lesley R. Morris  and
Cheryl Surface
Christo Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Oregon State University, La Grande, OR 97850
Lesley R. Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Oregon State University, La Grande, OR 97850
Cheryl Surface
Affiliation:
Washoe County Parks and Open Space, Reno, NV 89520
*
Corresponding Author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Downy brome has converted millions of hectares of Great Basin rangelands from shrubland to annual grass-dominated systems. Methods for removing downy brome from sites that already have perennial grasses established are especially needed because of the difficulty in re-establishing perennial species. In this study, early spring applications of glyphosate alone and glyphosate plus imazapic were monitored for 2 yr. Cover of downy brome was reduced from 45 to 10% by spring application of glyphosate alone and to approximately 1% with the addition of imazapic. Perennial grass cover was not affected by the spring application of glyphosate. The addition of imazapic reduced perennial grass cover in the first year; however, it recovered by the second year. The selective response to glyphosate may be due to differences in growth stage or dormancy characteristics between annual and perennial species. Our findings suggest spring application of glyphosate may provide an alternative approach for managing annual grasses on Great Basin rangelands.

Bromus tectorum ha convertido millones de hectáreas del territorio de Great Basin de sistemas arbustivos a sistemas dominados por gramíneas anuales. Métodos que remuevan B. tectorum de sitios que ya tienen gramíneas perennes establecidas son especialmente requeridos debido a la dificultad de re-establecer especies perennes. En este estudio, aplicaciones de glyphosate solo y glyphosate más imazapic, temprano en la primavera, fueron monitoreadas durante 2 años. La cobertura de B. tectorum se redujo de 45 a 10% con la aplicación de glyphosate solo y a aproximadamente 1% con la adición de imazapic. La cobertura de gramíneas perennes no fue afectada por la aplicación de glyphosate en la primavera. La adición de imazapic redujo la cobertura de gramíneas perennes en el primer año, pero se recuperó en el segundo año. La respuesta selectiva a glyphosate podría deberse a diferencias en el estadio de desarrollo o las características de latencia entre especies anuales y perennes. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la aplicación de glyphosate en la primavera podría brindar una alternativa para el manejo de gramíneas anuales en los territorios de Great Basin.

Keywords

Glyphosateimazapicdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. BROTECheatgrassdormancyfirerestoration
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 297 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Randy L. Anderson, USDA-Northern Grain Insects.

References

Literature Cited

Aguirre, L, Johnson, DA (1991) Influence of temperature and cheatgrass competition on seedling development of two bunchgrasses. J Range Manage 44:347–354 Google Scholar
Beck, KG, Sebastian, JR, Chapman, PL (1995) Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in perennial grasses. Weed Technol 9:255–259 Google Scholar
Clary, WP (1975) Ecotypic adaptation in Sitanion hystrix . Ecology 56:1407–1415 Google Scholar
Duncan, CA, Jachetta, JJ, Brown, ML, Carrithers, VF, Clark, JK, DiTomaso, JM, Lym, RG, McDaniel, KC, Renz, MJ, Rice, PM (2004) Assessing the economic, environmental, and societal losses from invasive plants on rangeland and wildlands. Weed Technol 18:1411–1416 Google Scholar
Elzinga, CL, Salzer, DW, Willoughby, JW (1998) Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1730-1. Denver, CO: BLM National Business Center. 477 pGoogle Scholar
Evans, RA, Young, JA (1972) Microsite requirements for establishment of annual rangeland weeds. Weed Sci 20:350–356 Google Scholar
Frey, MN, Herms, CP, Cardina, J (2007) Cold weather application of glyphosate for garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) control. Weed Technol 21:656–660 Google Scholar
Hardegree, SP, Moffet, CA, Roundy, BA, Jones, TA, Novak, SJ, Clark, PE, Pierson, FB, Flerchinger, GN (2010) A comparison of cumulative-germination response of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and five perennial bunchgrass species to simulated field-temperature regimes. Environ Exp Bot 69:320–327 Google Scholar
Harris, GA (1967) Some competitive relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum . Ecol Monogr 37:89–111 Google Scholar
Harris, GA (1977) Root phenology as a factor of competition among grass seedlings. J Range Manage 30:172–177 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJ, Morishita, DW, Price, WJ (2007) Season-long dose-response of potato to sulfometuron. Weed Sci 55:521–527 Google Scholar
Johnson, BJ (1976) Glyphosate for weed control in dormant bermudagrass. Weed Sci 24:140–143 Google Scholar
Knapp, PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) dominance in the Great Basin Desert. Global Environ Chang 6:37–52 Google Scholar
Kyser, GB, Creech, JE, Zhang, J, DiTomaso, JM (2012) Selective control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) in California sagebrush scrub using low rates of glyphosate. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 5:1–8 Google Scholar
Kyser, GB, DiTomaso, JM, Doran, MP, Orloff, SB, Wilson, RG, Lancaster, DL, Lile, DF, Porath, ML (2007) Control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and other annual grasses with imazapic. Weed Technol 21:65–75 Google Scholar
Kyser, GB, Wilson, RG, Zhang, J, DiTomaso, JM (2013) Herbicide-assisted restoration of Great Basin sagebrush steppe infested with medusahead and downy brome. Rangeland Ecol Manage 66:588–596 Google Scholar
Mack, RN, Pyke, DA (1983) The demography of Bromus tectorum: Variation in time and space. J Ecol 71:69–93 Google Scholar
Melgoza, G, Nowak, RS, Tausch, RJ (1990) Soil water exploitation after fire: competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83:7–13 Google Scholar
Monaco, TA, Osmond, TM, Dewey, SA (2005) Medusahead control with fall- and spring-applied herbicides on northern Utah foothills. Weed Technol 19:653–658 Google Scholar
Morris, C, Monaco, TA, Rigby, CW (2009) Variable impacts of imazapic rate on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and seeded species in two rangeland communities. Inv Plant Sci Manage 2:110–119 Google Scholar
Morris, C, Schupp, EW (2009) Comparison of emergence speed and sterility in two sterile annual hybrid cereal grasses developed for use in restoration. Restor Ecol 17:678–685 Google Scholar
Nasri, M, Doescher, PS (1995) Effect of temperature on growth of cheatgrass and Idaho fescue. J Range Manage 48:406–409 Google Scholar
Neal, JC, Skroch, WA, Monaco, TJ (1986) Effects of plant growth stage on glyphosate absorption and transport in ligustrum (Ligustrum japonicum) and blue pacific juniper (Juniperus conferta). Weed Sci 34:115–121 Google Scholar
Ross, MA, Lembi, CA (1999) Applied Weed Science. 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 452 pGoogle Scholar
Senseman, SA, ed. (2007) Herbicide Handbook. 9th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 82–84, 243–246 Google Scholar
Sheley, RL, Carpinelli, MF, Morghan, RJ (2007) Effects of imazapic on target and nontarget vegetation during revegetation. Weed Technol 21:1071–1081 Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2003) Rangeland Ecological Site Description: 026XY011NV. Reno, NV: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2015) Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed January 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Vegis, A (1964) Dormancy in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 15:185–224 Google Scholar
Whisenant, SG (1990) Changing fire frequencies on Idaho's Snake River plains: Ecological and management implications. Pages 4–10 in McArthur, ED, Romney, EM, Smith, SD, Tueller, PT, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-Off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management, General Technical Report INT-GTR-276. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Google Scholar
[WRCC] Western Regional Climate Center (2015) http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?nv6779. Accessed September 28, 2015Google Scholar
Whitson, TD, Koch, DW (1998) Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technol 12:391–396 Google Scholar
Wilcoxon, F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83 Google Scholar
Willoughby, I (1996) Dormant season application of broad spectrum herbicides in forestry. Aspects Appl Biol 44:55–62 Google Scholar
Wilson, RG (1997) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol 11:277–282 Google Scholar
Young, JA, Evans, RA (1977) Squirreltail seed germination. J Range Manage 30:33–36 Google Scholar
Young, JA, Longland, WS (1996) Impact of alien plants on Great Basin rangelands. Weed Technol 10:384–391 Google Scholar