Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:01:12.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean Tolerance to Early Preplant Applications of 2,4-D Ester, 2,4-D Amine, and Dicamba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

M. Angela Thompson ,
Lawrence E. Steckel ,
Andrew T. Ellis  and
Thomas C. Mueller
M. Angela Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, West Tennessee Research and Education Center, 605 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN 38301
Lawrence E. Steckel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, West Tennessee Research and Education Center, 605 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN 38301
Andrew T. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preplant applications of two 2,4-D formulations and dicamba were evaluated for injury to no-till soybean. Herbicides applied 28 or 21 d before planting (DBP) at 0.56 kg ae/ha for the 2,4-D formulations and 0.28 kg ae/ha for dicamba did not injure soybean. At 14 DBP soybean injury was lower (< 6%) with applications of 2,4-D than with dicamba (13% to 17%). Injury increased when herbicides were applied at 7 DBP with soybean injury from both 2,4-D (< 11%) and dicamba (< 38%). When the herbicides were applied at planting soybean injury was < 18% with the 2,4-D formulations and < 73% with dicamba. Soybean yields were unaffected by the injury from herbicides applied 21, 14, and 7 DBP. However, soybean yield was decreased to 870 kg/ha in 2005 when dicamba was applied at planting compared to the nontreated check (1,950 kg/ha)

Keywords

2,4-Ddicamba–diglycolamine saltsoybean, Glycine max L.Glyphosate-resistant weed controlsoybean injuryauxin-type herbicides
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 882 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2006a. 2,4-D amine herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld3CI000.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006b. 2,4-D ester herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld3CO000.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006c. Clarity (dicamba) herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld797000.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006d. Rifle (dicamba) herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld6MQ002.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1988. Cinmethylin for weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:678–682.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:642–647.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. H. and Lehmann, R. G. 1985. Characterization of herbicide degradation under field conditions. Weed Sci. 33:7–10.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365–374.Google Scholar
Doran, J. W., Wilhelm, W. W., and Power, J. F. 1984. Crop residue removal and soil productivity with no-till corn, sorghum and soybean. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:640–645.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, M. R., Daniel, T. C., Schweizer, E. E., and Allmaras, R. R. 1985. Conservation tillage. Science 230:625–630.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2006. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed 13 November, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. and Wax, L. M. 1979. Soybean stand establishment and yield as affected by herbicides and cultural practices. Agron. J. 71:880–884.Google Scholar
Kelly, K. B., Wax, L. M., Hager, A. G., and Reichers, D. E. 2005. Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 53:101–112.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., Hayes, R. M., and Montgomery, R. F. 2002. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Mississippi. Weed Sci. 18:820–825.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to 2,4-D ester applied preplant. Weed Technol. 7:906–910.Google Scholar
Main, C. L., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., and Wilkerson, J. B. 2004. Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) populations to glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:879–883.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Massey, J. H., Hayes, R. M., Main, C. L., and Stewart, C. N. Jr. 2003. Shikimate accumulates in both glyphosate-sensitive and glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:879–883.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Services 2004. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/news/thisweek/2004/041201/notillsurvey.html. Accessed November 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E. 2006. Weed Control Manual for Tennessee PB 1580. The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service. Knoxville, TN http://www.weeds.utk.edu. Accessed December 2006.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2001. Glyphosate in full-season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean:role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:714–724.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar