Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:27:42.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soybean (Glycine max) Yield and Quality Responses Associated with Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) Control Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Teresa S. Willard
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

In field studies conducted over 2 yr, POST applications of chlorimuron, imazaquin, fomesafen, or acifluorfen following PRE applications of clomazone, metribuzin, or metribuzin plus chlorimuron enhanced wild poinsettia control when compared with the PRE herbicides applied alone. Wild poinsettia control was highest for imazaquin compared with other PRE treatments and with the exception of fomesafen, applications of POST herbicides following imazaquin PRE did not improve weed control. With the addition of POST herbicides, soybean yields were generally not increased, but moisture content in one year and foreign material content both years were reduced. In other studies, early POST applications (2 to 8 cm) of fomesafen, imazaquin, acifluorfen, lactofen, and chlorimuron controlled wild poinsettia better than late POST applications (10 to 15 cm) in only one year. Soybean yields both years were generally similar regardless of herbicide application time.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J. M. and McWhorter, C. G. 1976. The economics of common cocklebur control in soybean production. Weed Sci. 24: 397400.Google Scholar
2. Bannon, J. S., Baker, J. B., Harger, T. R., and Rogers, R. L. 1976. Weed Watch. Weeds Today 8:12.Google Scholar
3. Griffin, J. L., Habetz, R. J., and Regan, R. P. 1984. Soybean weed control studies. Annu. Prog. Rep., Rice Res. Stn., La. Agric. Exp. Stn., La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., 76:324336.Google Scholar
4. Griffin, J. L. 1986. Wild poinsettia control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:475.Google Scholar
5. Harger, T. R. and Nester, P. R. 1980. Wild poinsettia: a major weed. Louisiana Agric. 23:4,5,7.Google Scholar
6. Hutchinson, J. and Dalziel, J. M. 1954. Flora of West Tropical Africa. Vol. I. Part 1. Crown Agents, London. 828 p.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Effectiveness of metribuzin applied preemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:385390.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Bentazon applied postemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:391396.Google Scholar
9. Nester, P. R., Harger, T. R., and McCormick, L. L. 1979. Weed watch-wild poinsettia. Weeds Today 10:2425.Google Scholar
10. Shoham, J. L., Sampson, T. A., Colby, S. R., and Sarpe, N. 1983. Mixtures of fomesafen and fluazifop-butyl for broad-spectrum postemergence weed control in soybean. Int. Congr. Plant Prot. 10:957.Google Scholar
11. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1988. Official United States standards for grain. U.S. Government Print Office. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
12. Vidrine, P. R., Killmer, J. L., and Rogers, R. L. 1974. Controlling wild poinsettia in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:47.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, A. K. 1981. Euphorbia heterophylla: a review of distribution, importance and control. Trop. Pest Manage. 27:3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar