Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:31:56.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) Herbicide Carryover to Grain and Fiber Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph D. Walsh ,
Michael S. Defelice  and
Barry D. Sims
Joseph D. Walsh
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Mo., Columbia, MO 65211
Michael S. Defelice
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Mo., Columbia, MO 65211
Barry D. Sims
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Mo., Delta Center, Portageville, MO 63873
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 1988, 1989, and 1990 at two locations in Missouri to study the influence of fall tillage on the soil persistence of several soybean herbicides and subsequent injury to the rotational crops winter wheat, corn, cotton, and grain sorghum. Chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, imazethapyr, and metribuzin plus chlorimuron were applied at their label and double label rate (2X) in soybean. Fall chisel plowing did not influence the carryover potential of these herbicides on any of the crops, in any year, or at either location of the research. However, herbicides injured several of these rotational crops. The 2X-label rate of clomazone reduced winter wheat grain yield at both locations. None of the herbicide treatments at either location reduced corn yield. Imazaquin applied at the 2X rate caused greater than 30% visible injury to cotton in 1989; however, cotton yield was not affected. The 2X rate of chlorimuron caused a reduction of grain sorghum yield in 1989, but not in 1990 or 1991 at Novelty.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidclomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinoneimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3379’ and ‘Funks G-4543’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delcot 344’grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Warner D-544’ and ‘Capehart Challenger’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Caldwell’Tillagechlorimuronclomazoneimazaquinimazethapyrmetribuzin plus chlorimuroncorncottongrain sorghumwinter wheat
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 625 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aniens, W. H. and Fuerst, E. P. 1990. Carryover injury of clomazone applied in soybeans (Glycine max) and fallow. Weed Technol. 4:855–861.Google Scholar
2. Baker, R. S. and Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Cotton response following soybeans treated with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:97.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, C. J. and Lavy, T. L. 1991. Injury and yield response of selected crops to imazaquin and norflurazon residues. Weed Technol. 5:598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton. Weed Sci. 37:820–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
7. Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relationships of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Curran, W. S., Knake, E. L., Leibl, R. A. 1991. Corn (Zea mays) injury following use of clomazone, chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Effects of tillage and application method on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40:482–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Goetz, A. J. and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Degradation of imazethapyr in Arkansas soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:341.Google Scholar
12. Goetz, A. J., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hajek, B. F. 1989. Sorption and mobility of chlorimuron in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 37:428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kendig, J. A. and Talbert, R. E. 1989. Wheat response to carryover from herbicides used on cotton, grain sorghum, and soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:61.Google Scholar
14. Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Knake, E. L. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) and rotational crop tolerance to chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of clomazone on soils, sediments, and clays. Weed Sci. 37:440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. McKinnon, J. and Weber, J. B. 1988. Leaching and capillary movement of imazaquin in soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:337.Google Scholar
19. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans. Weed Sci. 37:353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn. Weed Sci. 36:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Walsh, J. D., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1993. Influence of tillage on soybean (Glycine max) herbicide carryover to grass and legume forage crops in Missouri. Weed Sci. 41:144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Webber, C. L., Gebhardt, M. R., and Kerr, H. D. 1987. Effect of tillage on soybean growth and seed production. Agron. J. 79:952–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Wicks, G. A. and Burnside, O. C. 1965. Residue in soil one year after herbicides were applied to sorghum. Weed Sci. 13:173–174.Google Scholar
26. Witt, W. W. 1984. Response of weeds and herbicides under no-tillage conditions. p. 152–170 in Phillips, R. E. and Phillips, S. H., eds. No-Tillage Agriculture Principles and Practices. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar