Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:52:21.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silverleaf Nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) Control in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Brent Westerman  and
Don S. Murray
R. Brent Westerman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate, alone and in combination with other herbicides or additives, was evaluated as a spot or shielded treatment for the control of silverleaf nightshade in cotton in three experiments over four years. Glyphosate used at 10.8 g ae/L in 1985 on dryland cotton controlled 81 to 98% of the silverleaf nightshade, but cotton lint yields were reduced by all treatments compared to the weed-free check. Glyphosate used at 7.2 g ae/L in 1986 on irrigated cotton controlled 6 to 83% of the silverleaf nightshade, and lint yields were reduced only when multiple spot applications were made. Spot applications of glyphosate were effective for silverleaf nightshade control when applied 7 wk after crop emergence in 1988. Weed control and cotton injury were lower with shielded applications than spot applications. In 1989, retreatments during a season or the next year resulted in 95% or greater silverleaf nightshade control. Cotton yield increases from herbicide treatment were not observed in 1988; however, yield increases were observed in 1989 when spot treatments were applied to the more successful 1988 plots.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinealachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidammonium sulfatecotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., ‘Coker 500,’ ‘Earlybird 3755,’ and ‘Paymaster 145’silverleaf nightshade, Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav. ♯ SOLELTime of applicationfrequency of applicationweeks after crop emergencecrop responsespot applicationsshielded applicationsapplication equipmentSOLEL
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 720 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abemathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Silverleaf nightshade control in cotton with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:380.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. and Santelmann, P. W. 1976. Carolina horsenettle susceptibility to glyphosate at varying growth stages. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:402.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. 1979. Spot spraying applications. p. 136–137 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Phoenix, AZ. Jan. 7-11, 1979. Natl. Cotton Counc, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
4. Cuthbertson, E. G., Leys, A. R., and McMaster, G. 1976. Silverleaf nightshade—a potential threat to agriculture. Agric. Gaz. (New South Wales) 87:11–13.Google Scholar
5. Derr, J. F. 1989. Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) control with metsulfuron. Weed Technol. 3:381–384.Google Scholar
6. Frans, R., McClelland, M., and Kennedy, S. 1982. Chemical and cultural methods for bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30:481–484.Google Scholar
7. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Stone, J. F. 1988. Soil water relations of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 36:740–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Full-season interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:813–818.Google Scholar
9. Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987. Interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) on Spanish peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 14:39–41.Google Scholar
10. Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., Thullen, R. J., and Miller, J. H. 1984. Comparison of ropewick applicators for control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:431–435.Google Scholar
11. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Carter, C. H., and Miller, J. H. 1984. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:306–309.Google Scholar
12. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Miller, J. H., and Carter, C. H. 1983. Comparison of six cropping systems for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control. Weed Sci. 31:63–67.Google Scholar
13. Smith, B. S., Pawlak, J. A., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., and Green, J. D. 1990. Interference from established stands of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) lint yield. Weed Sci. 38:129–133.Google Scholar
14. Smith, D. T. and Wiese, A. F. 1970. Herbicidal control of silverleaf nightshade, ground cherry, buffalobur and nutsedge. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. PR-2850, p. 14–19.Google Scholar
15. Westerman, R. B. and Murray, D. S. 1990. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to glyphosate spot applied. Weed Technol. 4:759–764.Google Scholar