Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:02:03.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeding Cool-season Grasses to Suppress White Locoweed (Oxytropis sericea) Reestablishment and Increase Forage Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael H. Ralphs ,
Thomas A. Monaco ,
Jose R. Valdez  and
David Graham
Michael H. Ralphs*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service Poisonous Plant Laboratory, Logan UT 84341
Thomas A. Monaco
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service Forage and Range Laboratory, Logan UT 84322
Jose R. Valdez
Affiliation:
Forest Range and Watershed Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472
David Graham
Affiliation:
New Mexico Extension Service, P.O. Box 428, Clayton, NM 88415
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Livestock poisoning can occur on short-grass prairies when locoweeds are actively growing in spring before warm-season grasses begin growth. White locoweed grows in early spring, completes flowering and seed production by early summer, and goes dormant. Perennial cool-season grasses may provide competition to suppress locoweed or reduce its reestablishment following control. Furthermore, these grasses may provide alternative palatable forage to livestock early in the spring. The objective of this study was to suppress white locoweed reinvasion by seeding cool-season grasses at two mixed-grass and two short-grass prairie sites. White locoweed and associated species were controlled with glyphosate (1.1 kg ai/ha) and picloram (0.38 kg ae/ha) in 3 by 15 m plots. The plots were seeded to ‘CDII’ crested wheatgrass, ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass, ‘Luna’ pubescent wheatgrass, ‘Bozoisky’ Russian wildrye, smooth brome, ‘NewHy’ wheatgrass, sideoats grama, and ‘Immigrant’ forage kochia. In addition, a native grass plot, treated with picloram to control locoweed without harming the native grasses, and a nontreated control plot, were established in each replication. Establishment of crested wheatgrass, Siberian wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye averaged 60% over all sites. The other treatments had establishment rates < 30% and were considered unsuccessful. Forage production of Russian wildrye was 2,962 kg/ha, Siberian wheatgrass was 2,736 kg/ha, and crested wheatgrass was 2,339 kg/ha, compared with 1,051 kg/ha for the nontreated control. Mortality of locoweed seedlings was greatest in the pubescent wheatgrass seeding. All seeded species suppressed reestablishment of indigenous locoweed plants.

Keywords

Glyphosatepicloramwhite locoweed, Oxytropis sericea Nutt. Ex Torr. & Gray OXRMAcrested wheatgrass, Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertner × Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultesforage kochia, Kochia prostrata (L.) SchraderNewHy wheatgrass, Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Love × Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevskipubescent wheatgrass, Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) BeauvRussian wildrye, Psathyrostachys juncea (Fisch.) NevskiSiberian wheatgrass, Agropyron fragile (Roth) Candargysideoats grama, Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torrsmooth brome, Bromus inermis LeysserWeed competitionweed ecologypoisonous plant
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 661 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aguirre, L. and Johnson, D. A. 1991. Influence of temperature and cheatgrass competition on seedling development of two bunchgrasses. J. Range Manag. 44:347–354.Google Scholar
Asay, K. H., Chatterton, N. J., Jensen, K. B., Wang, R. R-C., Johnson, D. A., Horton, W. H., Palazzo, A. J., and Young, S. A. 1997. Registration of ‘CDII’ crested wheatgrass. Crop Sci. 37:1023.Google Scholar
Asay, K. H., Horton, W. H., Jensen, K. B., and Palazzo, A. J. 2001. Merits of native and introduced Triticeae grasses on semiarid rangelands. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:45–52.Google Scholar
Asay, K. H., Johnson, D. A., Jensen, K. B., Chatterton, N. J., Horton, W. H., Hansen, W. T., and Young, S. A. 1995. Registration of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian crested wheatgrass. Crop Sci. 35:1510.Google Scholar
Benz, L. J., Beck, K. G., Whitson, T. D., and Koch, D. W. 1999. Reclaiming Russian knapweed–infested rangeland. J. Range Manag. 52:351–356.Google Scholar
Bilbrough, C. J. and Caldwell, M. M. 1997. Exploitation of springtime ephemeral N pulses by six Great Basin plant species. Ecology 78:231–243.Google Scholar
Call, C. A. and Roundy, B. A. 1991. Perspectives and processes in revegetation of arid and semiarid rangelands. J. Range Manag. 44:543–549.Google Scholar
Callihan, R. H. and Evans, J. O. 1991. Weed dynamics on rangelands. in James, L.F., Evans, J.O., Ralphs, M.H., Child, R.D., eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO Westview. 54–61.Google Scholar
Cox, R. D. and Anderson, V. J. 2004. Increasing native diversity of cheatgrass-dominated rangeland through assisted succession. J. Range Manag. 57:203–210.Google Scholar
Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88:528–534.Google Scholar
Donovan, L. A., Grise, D. J., West, J. B., Papert, R. A., Alder, N. N., and Richards, J. H. 1999. Predawn disequilibrium between plant and soil water potentials in two cold-desert shrubs. Oecologia 120:209–217.Google Scholar
Eissenstat, D. M. and Caldwell, M. M. 1988. Competitive ability is linked to rates of water extraction: a field study of two arid land tussock grasses. Oecologia 75:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, G. D., Hubick, K. T., Condon, A. G., and Richards, R. A. 1988. Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water-use efficiency. in Rundel, P.W., Ehleringer, J.R., Nagy, K.A., eds. Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. New York Springer-Verlag. 21–40.Google Scholar
Heady, H. F. 1975. Range Management. New York McGraw-Hill. 7.Google Scholar
Jensen, K., Horton, H., Reed, R., and Whitesides, R. 2001. Intermountain Planting Guide. U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Services Forage and Range Laboratory Bulletin AG510.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. and Asay, K. H. 1978. A technique for assessing seedling emergence under drought stress. Crop Sci. 18:520–522.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. and Asay, K. H. 1993. Viewpoint: selection for improved drought response in cool-season grasses. J. Range Manag. 46:194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, R. A. and Sheley, R. L. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J. Range Manag. 54:502–517.Google Scholar
Payne, G. F. 1957. Certain aspects of the ecology and life history of the poisonous plant, white pointloco Oxytropis sericea . College Station, TX Texas A&M University Ph.D dissertation.Google Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession. Bot. Rev. 53:335–371.Google Scholar
Ralphs, M. H., Benson, B., and Loerch, J. C. 1989. Soil–site relationships of white locoweed on the Raft River Mountains. Great Basin Nat. 49:419–424.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. in. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 1243–1246.Google Scholar
Sellin, A. 1999. Does pre-dawn water potential reflect conditions of equilibrium in plant and soil water status. Oecologica 20:51–59.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Svejcar, T. J., and Maxwell, B. D. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed. Technol. 10:766–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. W., Roundy, B. A., McAuthur, E. D., Jessop, B. D., Waldron, B., and Davis, J. N. 2006. Fire rehabilitation using native and introduced species: a landscape trial. Range. Ecol. Manag. 59:237–248.Google Scholar
[USDA-SCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Soil Conservation Service 1980. Soil Survey of Larimer County, Colorado, CO644. Washington, DC National Conservation Resources Service.Google Scholar
[USDA-SCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Soil Conservation Service 1981. Soil Survey of Union County, New Mexico. Washington, DC National Conservation Resources Service.Google Scholar
Vogel, K. P. and Masters, R. A. 2001. Frequency grid—a simple tool for measuring grassland establishment. J. Range. Manag. 54:653–655.Google Scholar
Waldron, B. L., Monaco, T. A., Jensen, K. B., Harrison, R. D., Palazzo, A. J., and Kulbeth, J. B. 2005. Coexistence of native and introduced perennial grasses following simultaneous seeding. Agron. J. 97:990–996.Google Scholar