Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:06:54.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Season-Long Interference of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with Polyethylene-Mulched Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Timothy N. Motis*
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Salvadore J. Locascio
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
James P. Gilreath
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Bradenton, FL 34203
William M. Stall
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Yellow nutsedge, a weed commonly present in Florida vegetable fields, may substantially reduce crop yields when not controlled. Soil fumigation with methyl bromide effectively controls nutsedges, but methyl bromide is being phased out of production and use in the United States. Therefore, nutsedge management in bell pepper is a cause for concern. An experiment was conducted during four seasons (spring and fall of 1999 and 2000) to determine the tolerance of bell pepper grown at two in-row spacings (23 and 31 cm) to interference resulting from planted yellow nutsedge tuber densities (0 to 120 tubers/m2). Relative to yields with no nutsedge, pepper fruit yields in each season were reduced 10% with fewer than 5 planted tubers/m2. Yield losses increased more rapidly with an increase in initial nutsedge density from 0 to 30 than from 30 to 120 tubers/m2. With 30 nutsedge tubers/m2, large fruit yield was reduced 54 to 74% compared to that with no nutsedge. Nutsedge shoots overtopped the pepper plants as early as 6 wk after treatment when, with 15 planted tubers/m2, nutsedge interference reduced pepper plant biomass by 10 to 47%. In the absence of methyl bromide, weed control strategies with high efficacy against yellow nutsedge will be needed for bell pepper production.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Publication R-08940 Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series.

References

Literature Cited

Buker, R. S. III. 1999. Interference of Yellow Nutsedge with Watermelon. . University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 120 p.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III, Olson, S. M., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1998. Watermelon yield as effected by competition from varying yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) populations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 9596.Google Scholar
Chase, C. A., Sinclair, T. R., Shilling, D. G., Gilreath, J. P., and Locascio, S. J. 1998. Light effects on rhizome morphogenesis in nutsedges (Cyperus spp.): implications for control by soil solarization. Weed Sci. 46: 575580.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107: 239252.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5: 664673.Google Scholar
de Vries, F. T. 1991. Chufa (Cyperus esculentus, Cyperaceae): a weedy cultivar or a cultivated weed? Econ. Bot. 45: 2737.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Protection of stratospheric ozone: incorporation of Montreal Protocol adjustment for a 1999 interim reduction in Class I, Group VI controlled substances. Federal Regist. 64: 2924029245.Google Scholar
Jeon, H. J. and Chung, H. D. 1982. Effect of shade on the flowering, yield and fruit composition of different red pepper, Capsicum annuum L., cultivars. J. Korean Soc. Hortic. Sci. 23: 253260.Google Scholar
Lanini, W. T. and Le Strange, M. 1991. Low-input management of weeds in vegetable fields. Calif. Agric. 45: 1113.Google Scholar
Locascio, S. J. and Stall, W. M. 1982. Plant arrangement for increased bell pepper yield. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 95: 333335.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. N. and Hochmuth, G. J. 1997. Knott's Handbook for Vegetable Growers. 4th ed. New York: J. Wiley. 170 p.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P. 1999. Interference of Purple and Yellow Nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus L. and Cyperus esculentus L.) with Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 315 p.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1998. Interference of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) population densities on bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) yield as influenced by nitrogen. Weed Technol. 12: 230234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1: 190198.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1997. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp). Weed Sci. 45: 229233.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 3884 p.Google Scholar
Shifriss, C., Pilowsky, M., and Aloni, B. 1994. Variation in flower abscission of peppers under stress shading conditions. Euphytica 78: 133136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumbleson, M. E. and Kommedahl, T. 1961. Reproductive potential of Cyperus esculentus by tubers. Weeds 9: 646653.Google Scholar
William, R. D. and Warren, G. F. 1975. Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci. 23: 317323.Google Scholar
Witzig, J. D. and Pugh, N. L. 2001. Florida Agricultural Statistics: Vegetable Summary 1999–2000. Orlando, FL: Florida Agricultural Statistical Service. 62 p.Google Scholar