Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:16:59.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Season-Long Interference of American Black Nightshade with Watermelon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Celeste A. Gilbert ,
William M. Stall ,
Carlene A. Chase  and
Raghavan Charudattan
Celeste A. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department
William M. Stall*
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department
Carlene A. Chase
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department
Raghavan Charudattan
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted over two spring seasons (2005 and 2006) to investigate the interference between American black nightshade and watermelon in polyethylene-mulched and nonmulched (bare ground) trials. Competition studies were performed with watermelon at 1 plant/m in-row and American black nightshade grown at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 plants/m2 in-row. Watermelon yield reductions started to plateau at only 2 American black nightshade plants/m2. Yield reduction was 80, 89, 96, and 98% and 54, 67, 81, and 85% at 2, 4, 6, and 8 American black nightshade plants/m2 in mulched watermelon production in 2005 and 2006, respectively. When watermelon was grown on bare ground, yield reduction was 100% at 2 American black nightshade plants/m2 in 2005 and 68, 81, 89, and 93% at 2, 4, 6, and 8 American black nightshade plants/m2 in 2006, respectively. Watermelon fruit numbers were reduced due to American black nightshade interference, but no significant differences in individual fruit weight were observed.

Keywords

American black nightshade, Solanum americanum Mill., SOLAMwatermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai. cv. ‘Mardi Gras’Additive designcompetitionmulchplasticultureyield loss
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 186 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., Kostewicz, S. R., and Smith, K. 1991. Alternatives for control of paraquat tolerant American black nightshade (Solanum americanum). Weed Technol. 5:61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinen, G. H., Locascio, S. J., and Elmstrom, G. W. 1979. Plant and row spacing, mulch, and fertilizer rate effects on watermelon production. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104:724–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buker, R. S., Stall, W. M., Olson, S. M., and Shilling, D. G. 2003. Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with direct-seeded and transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol. 17:751–754.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model of relating yield reduction to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.Google Scholar
Larson, B. C., Mossler, M. A., and Nesheim, O. N. 2004. Florida Crop/Pest Management Profile: Watermelon. Circ. 1236. Gainesville, FL University of Florida. 36.Google Scholar
Lu, W., Edelson, J. V., Duthie, J. A., and Roberts, B. W. 2003. A comparison of yield between high and low intensity management for watermelon cultivars. HortScience 38:351–356.Google Scholar
Monks, D. and Schultheis, J. R. 1998. Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Sci. 46:530–532.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2005. Florida Agricultural Statistics. United States Department of Agriculture. http://www.nass.usda.gov. Accessed: November 23, 2007.Google Scholar
Olson, S. M., Simonne, E. H., Maynard, D. N., Hochmuth, G. J., Vavrina, C. S., Stall, W. M., Roberts, P. D., Webb, S. E., Taylor, T. G., and Smith, S. A. 2005. Cucurbit production in Florida. Pages 181–224. in Olson, S. M. and Simonne, E. H., editors. Vegetable Production Handbook for Florida. Lincolnshire, IL Vance Publishing.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. C., Cure, J. D., and Schultheis, J. R. 1999. Yield response of watermelon to planting density, planting pattern, and polyethylene mulch. HortScience 34:1221–1223.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2006. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028.Google Scholar
Terry, E. R., Stall, W. M., Shilling, D. G., Bewick, T. A., and Kostewicz, S. R. 1997. Smooth amaranth interference with watermelon and muskmelon production. HortScience 32:630–632.Google Scholar
Wallinder, C. J. and Talbert, R. E. 1983. Goosegrass interference with watermelon growth. Pages 158. 158. in. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 83.Google Scholar