Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:25:12.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Management Practices on Control of Isoproturon-Resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Samunder Singh*
Affiliation:
Weed Control, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125 004, India
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Littleseed canarygrass is a major weed of winter-season crops, although it is most dominant in wheat-growing regions in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. Resistance in this species to photosystem II–inhibiting herbicide isoproturon was first recorded in 1992, and has since spread to several Indian states covering more than a million ha. Genetic studies and resistance characterization from multiple locations indicate independent evolution of resistance due to continuous use of isoproturon and monoculture rice–wheat-cropping system. Isoproturon-resistant biotypes were found cross-resistant to diclofop, but not to chlortoluron, which has the same mode of action as isoproturon. The isoproturon-resistance mechanism is metabolic degradation, mediated by P-450 monooxygenase enzymes. This type of resistance could become serious and lead to the evolution of multiple resistances to herbicides of different modes of action. Adoption of fenoxaprop-P, clodinafop, and sulfosulfuron in isoproturon-resistant areas since 1997 initially led to high yields, but resulted in a weed flora shift which eventually reduced yields and increased the cost of weed management. Although isoproturon recommendation has been withdrawn from rice–wheat cropping zones, resistance in littleseed canarygrass is spreading in other areas where isoproturon has been used for several years because it is inexpensive and has broad-spectum weed control. Management factors, such zero or minimum tillage, early planting after rice harvest, and alternative herbicides provide effective control of resistant biotypes. However, lower efficacy of these herbicides has been observed in the field, although multiple resistances have yet to be confirmed. Herbicide rotations, mixtures, and sequences are beneficial, but only in the short term. Improved cultivation practices are also helpful; however, no current single system is sustainable. An integration of tillage method, planting time, varietal selection, crop rotation, timing and method of herbicide application, optimum dose, and sanitation practices is crucial in managing herbicide-resistant littleseed canarygrass.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 1996. Project Report: All India Coordinated Research Project on Weed Control. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University. 49.Google Scholar
Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., Panwar, R. S., and Singh, S. 1991. Competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars with wild oat (Avena ludoviciana). Weed Sci. 39:154158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brar, L. S., Walia, U. S., Gill, B. S., and Jand, S. 2003. Influence of paddy residue management techniques on the bioefficacy of herbicides for control of Phalaris minor in rice–wheat system. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 35:186189.Google Scholar
Chahal, P. S., Brar, H. S., and Walia, U. S. 2003. Management of Phalaris minor in wheat through integrated approach. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 35:15.Google Scholar
Chand, M., Diwakar, M. C., and Yaduraju, N. T. 2002. Interception of herbicide resistant weeds in imported Australian wheat. Pages 5051. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-Till in Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Chhokar, R. S., Malik, R. K., and Balyan, R. S. 1999. Effect of moisture stress and seedling depth on germination of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz). Ind. J. Weed Sci. 31:7879.Google Scholar
Franke, A. C., McRoberts, N., Marshall, G., Malik, R. K., Singh, S., and Nehra, A. S. 2001. The contribution of zero tillage for the management of Phalaris minor in the Indian rice–wheat system. British Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 2:901906.Google Scholar
Franke, A. C., McRoberts, N., Marshall, G., Malik, R. K., Singh, S., and Nehra, A. S. 2002. Soil longevity and emergence of Phalaris minor as affected by tillage regime and herbicide resistance. Pages 3540. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-Till in Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Franke, A. C., McRoberts, N., Marshall, G., Malik, R. K., Singh, S., and Nehra, A. S. 2003. A survey of Phalaris minor in the Indian rice–wheat system. Expl. Agric. 39:253265.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 1993. Evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds: causes, prevention, and ameliorative management. Pages 173178. in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture. Hisar, India Ind. Soc. Weed Sci. Google Scholar
Gupta, R. 2003. Addressing resource conservation issues in rice–wheat systems of South Asia: a resource book. Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains. New Delhi, India International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. 305.Google Scholar
Kaundun, D. 2007. Occurrence and management of herbicide resistance. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Herbicide Resistance in the Rice–Wheat Cropping Systems. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University in.Google Scholar
Kaur, H., Brar, H. S., and Walia, U. S. 2003. Competitive ability of wheat cultivars sown on different dates with littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz). Ind. J. Weed Sci. 35:2123.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. C., Singh, S., and Marshall, G. 1997. Resistance of Phalaris minor to isoproturon: mechanism and management implications. Pages 204207. in Proceedings of the 16th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference on Integrated Weed Management Towards Sustainable Agriculture. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. 2003. Competition and control of weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. M.Sc. Thesis. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University. 97.Google Scholar
Kyser, G. B. and DiTomaso, J. M. 2006. Tests of an Imperial Valley, California, population of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.) for resistance to grass herbicides. http://www.weedscience.org/Case/Case.asp?ResistID=5163. Accessed: July 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Mahajan, G. and Brar, L. S. 2002. Integrated management of Phalaris minor in wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 33:913.Google Scholar
Mahajan, G., Brar, L. S., and Sardana, V. 2004. Efficacy of clodinafop against isoproturon-resistant Phalaris minor in relation to wheat cultivars and spacing. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 36:166170.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K., Panwar, R. S., Bhan, V. M., and Malik, R. S. 1989. Influence of 2,4-D and surfactant in combination with urea herbicides on the control of weeds in wheat. Trop. Pest Manage. 35:127129.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K. and Singh, S. 1993. Evolving strategies for herbicide use in wheat: resistance and integrated weed management. Pages 225238. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 1. Hisar, India Indian Society of Weed Science.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K. and Singh, S. 1994. Effect of biotype and environment on the efficacy of isoproturon against wild canary grass. Test of Agrochemicals and Cultivars 15. Ann. Appl. Biol. 124:Suppl. 52–53.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K. and Singh, S. 1995. Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) resistance to isoproturon in India. Weed Technol. 9:419425.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K., Yadav, A., Garg, V. K., Balyan, R. S., Malik, Y. S., Malik, R. S., and Dhawan, R. 1995. Herbicide resistance-current status and research findings. Extension Year Bulletin. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University. 37.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K., Yadav, A., Singh, S., Malik, R. S., Balyan, R. S., Jaipal, S., Hobbs, P., Gill, G. S., Gupta, R. K., and Bellinder, R. R. 2002. Herbicide Resistance Management and Evolution of Zero Tillage—A Success Story. Research Bulletin. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University. 43.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R. 1987. Herbicide resistance in blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Proc. British Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds 3:879886.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R. and Cussans, G. W. 1985. Variability in the susceptibility of Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass) to chlorotoluron and isoproturon. Asp. Appl. Biol. 9:9198.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R. and Cussans, G. W. 1987. Detection and practical significance of herbicide resistance with particular reference to the weed Alopecurus myosuroides (black grass). Pages 200213. in Ford, M., Holloman, D., Khambay, B. and Sawicki, R. eds. Combating Resistance to Xenobiotics: Biological and Chemical Approaches. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Pieterse, P. J. and Kellerman, J. L. 2002. Quantifying the incidence of herbicide resistance in South Africa. Resistant Pest Manage. Newsletter 12:3941.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. 1996. Littleseed canary grass (Phalaris minor) resistance to ACCase inhibiting herbicide, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in Mexican wheat. http://www.weedscience.org/Case/Case.asp?ResistID=478. Accessed: July 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1996. Effect of rice straw burning, nitrogen and herbicides on wheat and Phalaris minor . Ph.D Thesis Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University. 101.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1998. Studies on the mechanism of isoproturon resistance in Phalaris minor (littleseed canarygrass). Ph.D Thesis Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom University of Strathclyde. 251.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1997. Effects of isoproturon on photosynthesis in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Phalaris minor and wheat. Weed Res. 37:315324.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1998a. Effect of the monooxygenase inhibitor piperonyl butoxide on the herbicidal activity and metabolism of isoproturon in herbicide resistant and susceptible biotypes of Phalaris minor and wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 59:143153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1998b. Effect of ABT on the activity and rate of degradation of isoproturon in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Phalaris minor and in wheat. Pestic. Sci. 53:123132.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1998c. Control of isoproturon resistant biotypes of Phalaris minor by chlorotoluron and clodinafop-propargyl. Resistant Pest Manage. Newsletter 10:1518.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1999. A review of the biology and control of Phalaris minor Retz. (littleseed canarygrass) in cereals. Crop Prot. 18:116.Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Malik, R. K. 1990. Integration of weed management technology for reducing soil and water pollution. Pages 283287. in Progress in Pollution Research. Bangalore, India Proceedings of the National Young Scientists Seminar on Environmental Pollution, UAS.Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Malik, R. K. 1993. Effect of time of application of isoproturon on the control of weeds in late sown wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 25:6669.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Singh, S. 1995a. Distribution of weed flora of wheat in Haryana. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 27:114121.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Malik, R. K., Malik, Y. P., and Garg, V. K. 1993. Resistance of some Phalaris minor biotypes to isoproturon but not to pendimethalin. Pages 125130. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 2. Hisar, India Indian Society of Weed Sciences.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Malik, R. K., Panwar, R. S., and Balyan, R. S. 1995b. Influence of sowing time on winter wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) control in wheat (Triticum aestivum) with isoproturon. Weed Sci. 43:370374.Google Scholar
Singh, G. and Singh, V. P. 2005. Compatibility of clodinafop-propargyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl with carfentrazone-ethyl, metsulfuron-methyl and 2,4-D. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 37:15.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Singh, S., Sharma, S. D., Punia, S. S., and Singh, H. 2005a. Performance of tank mixture of metribuzin with clodinafop for the control of mixed weed flora in wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 37:912.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Singh, V. P., and Singh, M. 2002. Effect of doses and stages of application of sulfosulfuron on weeds and wheat weeds. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 34:172–74.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Singh, V. P., and Singh, M. 2003. Studies on the effect of mesosulfuron and iodosulfuron on weeds in wheat, their compatibility with other chemicals and residual effects on succeeding crops. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 35:173178.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Singh, S., Singh, H., Malik, R. K., and Narwal, S. 2005b. Performance of tank mixture of chlorsulfuron and dinitroaniline herbicides for the control of weeds in wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 37:2022.Google Scholar
Smit, J. J. and Cairns, A. L. P. 2000. Resistance of little seeded canary grass (Phalaris minor Retz.) to ACCase inhibitors. South Africa J. Plant Soil 17:124127.Google Scholar
Tal, A., Zakra, S., and Rubin, B. 1996. Fenoxaprop-P resistance in Phalaris minor conferred by an insensitive acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 56:134140.Google Scholar
Tamayo-Esquer, L. M. and Martinez-Carrillo, J. L. 2002. Resistance of littleseed canary-grass Phalaris minor Retz. and hood canary-grass Phalaris paradoxa L. to commercial herbicides in the Yaqui Valley of Sonora, Mexico. Resistant Pest Manage. Newsletter 12:3339.Google Scholar
Vincent, D. and Quirke, D. 2002. Controlling Phalaris minor in the Indian rice-wheat belt. Pages 35. ACIAR Impact Assessment Series No. 18.Google Scholar
Walia, U. S. and Brar, L. S. 2007. Current status of Phalaris minor resistance against isoproturon and alternate herbicides in the rice–wheat cropping systems in Punjab. in Proceeding of the National Symposium on Herbicide Resistance in the Rice–Wheat Cropping Systems. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Walia, U. S., Brar, L. S., and Jand, S. 2003. Integrated effect of planting methods and herbicides on Phalaris minor in wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 35:169172.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., Chauhan, B. S., and Gill, G. S. 2002a. Present status of herbicide resistance in Haryana. Pages 1522. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-Till in Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., Gill, G., Singh, S., Chauhan, B. S., and Bellinder, R. R. 2007. Current status of weed resistance to herbicides in rice–wheat cropping system of India. in Proceeding of the National Symposium on Herbicide Resistance in the Rice–Wheat Cropping Systems. Hisar, India CCS Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., Pahwa, S. K., and Bellinder, R. R. 2004. Evaluation of triasulfuron alone and as tank mixture with clodinafop, fenoxaprop, sulfosulfuron or tralkoxydim against complex weed flora in wheat. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 36:4146.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., Sayre, K. D., Brar, L. S., and Singh, G. 2001. Cross-resistance in Phalaris minor against fenoxaprop—red signals appears in India. in. Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of the Indian Society of Weed Sciences, UAS, Bangalore, India 2324.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Sirohi, R. M., Chauhan, B. S., Bellinder, R., and Malik, R. K. 2002b. Alarming contamination of wheat produce with resistant Phalaris minor . Pestology 26:4144.Google Scholar
Yaduraju, N. T. 1991. Effect of plant growth stage and environmental factors on the activity of isoproturon against small canary grass (Phalaris minor). Ind. J. Agron. 36:202206.Google Scholar