Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:35:11.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of IR-4 in The Herbicide Registration Process for Specialty Food Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Daniel L. Kunkel*
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
Frederick P. Salzman
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
Marija Arsenovic
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
Jerry J. Baron
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
Michael P. Braverman
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
Robert E. Holm
Affiliation:
Interregional Research 4 (IR-4) Project, Center for Minor Crop Pest Management, Rutgers, The State University, 500 College Road, East Suite 210 W, Princeton, NJ 08540
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) Specialty Food Crops Program is a publicly-funded program initiated in 1963 to develop and submit regulatory data to support registration of pest control products for specialty crops. In the early to mid 1990s, nearly 45% of the IR-4 residue projects supported new herbicide registrations for fruits and vegetables with the other 55% devoted to fungicides, insecticides, and nematacides. In 2005, the number of residue projects conducted by IR-4 to support herbicide fruit and vegetable registrations was less than 30%. The three main factors that have contributed to this decline are: fewer herbicides available for registration; product liability concerns; and an increased focus on new, safer, and Reduced Risk Pesticides for insect and disease control. It has been a number of years since a new herbicide has been developed for a major crop that could be extended to specialty food crops. Many of the current IR-4 herbicide projects are with products that have been on the market for 20 or more years. Product liability is a concern because of the high value of many specialty crops relative to the potential market opportunity. In many cases, the registrant requires product performance data before IR-4 can proceed with a residue project. With limited funds for developing these data, many new projects never proceed to the regulatory stage. Although registrants can seek indemnification for some of these uses, it is a complicated often state-specific process. IR-4 has been successful in a number of areas, including the registration of a large numbers of uses through reduced data extrapolations for products such as glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl. Additionally, IR-4 submitted the first successful petition establishing an exemption of tolerance for a conventional herbicide (imazamox). Future IR-4 initiatives include collaboration with industry, growers, and academia to develop new herbicide technologies such as plant breeding or transgenic crops and generation of appropriate data to extend those products to specialty food crops. IR-4 will also assist in registering products that can be used on crops that have been selected (or developed through biotechnological approaches) to be tolerant to existing herbicides. Registrants should strongly consider developing herbicides for specialty food crops, with IR-4's assistance, as a means to expand markets and also as a means to extend data protection of their products, as allowed under the Food Quality Protection Act.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2000. Glyphosate: Pesticide Tolerance. Final rule. in. Federal Register, September 27, 2000 5795757966.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2004. Code of Federal Regulations, Number 40. Parts 160 (GLPs) and 180 (crop grouping). Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. 144156 and 333–343.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/site/408/default.aspx. Accessed: March 10, 2008.Google Scholar
Baron, J. J. and Kunkel, D. L. 1998. Impact of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 on food tolerances in minor crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 38:68.Google Scholar
Bradford, K. J., Alston, J. M., Lemaux, P. G., and Summer, D. A. 2004. Challenges and opportunities for horticultural biotechnology. Calif. Agric. 58:6871.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A. and Umeda, K. 2003. Weed control in glyphosate-tolerant lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Weed Technol. 17:738746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, N. D. and Gordon Harvey, R. 2000. Benefits of Transgenic Bt/Liberty Link Sweet Corn. 2000 Wisconsin Fertilizer, Aglime, and Pest Management Conference Proceedings. http://www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/FAPM/proceedings/2B.flowers.pdf. Accessed: March 10, 2008.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. G., Gould, A., and Tejada, A. 2002. FAO/OECD Global zoning project for pesticide residues in food. Abstract 6b.03. Proceedings of the 10th IUPAC International Congress on the Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel Switzerland. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Mossler, M. A. and Dunn, E. 2005. Florida Crop/Pest Management Profile: Lettuce. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PI/PI07000.pdf. Accessed: March 10, 2008.Google Scholar