Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:32:31.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice (Oryza sativa) Response to Clomazone plus Bensulfuron and Halosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher R. Mudge ,
Eric P. Webster ,
Wei Zhang  and
Christopher T. Leon
Christopher R. Mudge
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Christopher T. Leon
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 2002 and 2003 to evaluate the effect of clomazone at 448 g ai/ha plus bensulfuron at 10, 21, 31, and 42 g ai/ha or halosulfuron at 13, 26, 39, and 53 g ai/ha on rice. Herbicide treatments were impregnated onto urea fertilizer and applied at rooting (AR) in a water-seeded production system. Comparison treatments included clomazone AR followed by bensulfuron at 42 g/ha or halosulfuron at 53 g/ha POST. At 7 d after AR (DAAR), rice foliar bleaching decreased from 42% with a single application of clomazone to 23 to 30% with any rate of bensulfuron or halosulfuron impregnated with clomazone. Barnyardgrass and broadleaf signalgrass control did not decrease with the addition of bensulfuron or halosulfuron to clomazone. A single application of clomazone did not control rice flatsedge at 28 DAAR; however, rice flatsedge control was greater than 76% for all bensulfuron and halosulfuron treatments at 28 DAAR. There were no differences in rice yield among herbicide treatments.

Keywords

Clomazonebensulfuronhalosulfuronbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash # BRAPPrice flatsedge, Cyperus iria L. # CYPIRrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Cocodrie’Herbicide toleranceherbicide-impregnated fertilizerAR, at rootingDAAR, days after ARDAT, days after treatmentDPRE, delayed preemergencefb, followed by
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 879 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Published with approval of the director of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, under manuscript number 05-14-0152.
Current address: P.O. Box 110500, 304 Newell Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611.

References

Literature Cited

Bollich, P. K., Jordan, D. L., Walker, D. M., and Burns, A. B. 2000. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to the microencapsulated formulation of clomazone. Weed Technol. 14:89–93.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. P. 1995. Weed control in rice (Oryza sativa) with quinclorac and bensulfuron coating of granular herbicides and fertilizer. Weed Technol. 9:494–498.Google Scholar
Brommer, C. L., Shaw, D. R., Duke, S. O., Reddy, K. N., and Willeford, K. O. 2000. Antagonism of BAS 625 by selected broadleaf herbicides and the role of ethanol. Weed Sci. 48:181–187.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1987. Influence of application method on the activity of butylate and EPTC in reduced-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 35:412–417.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Marth, J. L., and Corbin, F. T. 2001. Effect of insecticides on clomazone absorption, translocation, and metabolism in cotton. Weed Sci. 49:613–616.Google Scholar
Ferriera, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222–226.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20.Google Scholar
Hatfield, L. D. and Mitchell, H. R. 1996. Grass control with clomazone in rice. Proc South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:46.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E., Roberts, S. R., Bayer, D. E., and Williams, J. F. 1990. Crop response and weed control from new herbicide combinations in water seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 4:838–842.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Interactions of fenoxaprop-ethyl with bensulfuron and bentazon in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 9:724–727.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Walker, D. M. 1998. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci. 46:374–380.Google Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Saichuk, J. K., Seilhan, K. P., Bollich, P. K., and Funderburg, E. R. 1999. General agronomic guidelines. in Anonymous ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University AgCenter Publication 2321. Pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Martin, D. A., Miller, S. D., and Alley, H. P. 1989. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to herbicides applied at three growth stages. Weed Technol. 3:90–94.Google Scholar
Miller, D. K. and Jordan, D. L. 1997. Postemergence barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with tank mixtures of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:98.Google Scholar
Miller, T. C. 1993. Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University. 115 p.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Gage, E. V. 1999. Command 3ME: weed control in southern rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:186.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Hatfield, L. D. 1996. Grass control in rice with clomazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:46.Google Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1994. Efficacy of corn (Zea mays) herbicides applied at reduced rates impregnated on dry fertilizer. Weed Technol. 8:830–835.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2002. SAS/STAT Users Guide (Version 9). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Pp. 2083–2226.Google Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., and Clark, S. D. 2004. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar tolerance to clomazone. Weed Technol. 18:140–144.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1989. Growth and physiological responses of normal, dwarf, and albino corn (Zea mays) to clomazone treatments. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 35:81–88.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1999. The potential for clomazone use in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 13:390–393.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Leon, C. T., Pellerin, K. J., and Zhang, W. 2002a. Weed Science Annual Research Report. Baton Rouge, LA. Louisiana State University AgCenter Pub. Pp. 252–260.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Leon, C. T., Zhang, W., and Pellerin, K. J. 2002b. Command use in water-seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:37.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., and Frans, R. E. 1991. Insecticides modify cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to clomazone. Weed Technol. 5:729–735.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Blouin, D. C., and Linscombe, S. D. 2004. Differential tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to clomazone. Weed Technol. 18:73–76.Google Scholar