Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:17:23.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice (Oryza sativa) Response and Annual Grass Control with Graminicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nathan W. Buehring ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Ford L. Baldwin
Nathan W. Buehring*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Ford L. Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock, AR 72204
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate rice injury and control of propanil-resistant and -susceptible (natural infestation) barnyardgrass, broadleaf signalgrass, and Amazon sprangletop with BAS 625, cyhalofop, and fenoxaprop plus the safener isoxadifen in rice. BAS 625 at 100 g ai/ha applied to two- to three-leaf rice resulted in 19 to 72% injury in three of four experiments. Fenoxaprop plus isoxadifen at 90 + 98 g ai/ha injured rice 11 to 31%, and cyhalofop at 280 g ai/ha consistently resulted in minimal rice injury. The most effective control (84 to 99%) of propanil-resistant and propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass across all experiments was achieved with sequential applications of the BAS 625 at 75 and 100 g ai/ha, cyhalofop at 210 and 280 g ai/ha, and fenoxaprop plus isoxadifen at 68 + 74 and 90 + 98 g ai/ha. When the graminicides were applied to four- to six-leaf rice (one tiller), propanil-resistant and propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass control was generally very poor. Fenoxaprop plus isoxadifen controlled broadleaf signalgrass 91 to 100%, even when applied once to four- to six-leaf rice. BAS 625 at 75 and 100 g ai/ha and cyhalofop at 210 and 280 g ai/ha applied sequentially provided consistent broadleaf signalgrass control (≥98%). Amazon sprangletop control was good (85 to 99%) with fenoxaprop plus isoxadifen at 45 + 49, 68 + 74, and 90 + 98 g ai/ha (applied in a single application or sequentially), BAS 625 at 100 g ai/ha applied to two- to three-leaf and four- to six-leaf rice or 50, 75, and 100 g ai/ha applied sequentially, and cyhalofop at 140, 210, and 280 g ai/ha applied to two- to three-leaf rice or sequentially.

Keywords

BAS 625, 2-[1-[2-(4-chlorophenoxy)propoxyimino]-butyl]3-oxo-5-thian-3-ylcyclohex-1-enolcyhalofopfenoxapropisoxadifen (4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-3-isoxazolecarboxylic acid)Amazon sprangletop, Leptochloa panicoides (Presl.) Hitchc. # LEFPAbarnyardgrass Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCGbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash. # BRAPPrice, Oryza sativa L.Application timingACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylaseWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 738 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L., Dillon, T., Dillon, T., Pearow, N., and Dillon, M. 2000. Weed Control Demonstrations. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 116–121 and 124–125.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 8:576–581.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995. Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 9:366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1992. Reduced and standard herbicide rates for grass control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 6:409–414.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, C. J., Skroch, W. A., and Burton, J. D. 1993. Resistance of selected ornamental grasses to graminicides. Weed Technol. 7:326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, D. 1987. Influence of environmental factors on the performance of sethoxydim against Elymus repens (L). Weed Res. 27:329–336.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Baker, J. B. 1990. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to fenoxaprop, sethoxydim, and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 38:528–531.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B., Smith, R. J. Jr., Helms, R. S., and Baltazar, A. M. 1992. Rice cultivar response to rice herbicides and simulated rice herbicide drift to sensitive crops. in Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1991. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas, Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Research Series No. 476. Pp. 69–72.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Web page: www.weedscience.org.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., Shaw, D. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Comparison of graminicides applied at equivalent costs in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 11:804–809.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1993. The effect of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) plant height on control with six postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:491–494.Google Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N., Marshall, G., and De Prado, R. 1997. Resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to atrazine and quinclorac. Pestic. Sci. 51:171–175.Google Scholar
Lovelace, M. L., Talbert, R. E., Schmidt, L. A., and Scherder, E. F. 2000. Tomato response and residue detection from simulated drift rates of quinclorac. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:155–156.Google Scholar
Ntanos, D. A., Koutroubas, S. D., and Mavrotas, C. 2000. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with cyhalofop-butyl. Weed Technol. 14:383–388.Google Scholar
Peters, T. J., Moomaw, R. S., and Martin, A. R. 1989. Herbicides for postemergence control of annual grass weeds in seedling forage grasses. Weed Sci. 37:375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, D. B., Wheless, T. G., and Murray, D. S. 1988. Moisture stress effects on absorption and translocation of four foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 2:437–441.Google Scholar
Rossi, F. S., Neal, J. C., and Senesac, A. F. 1994. Alleviating the antagonistic effect of moisture stress on smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) control with fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 42:418–423.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1977. Comparisons of herbicide treatments for weed control in rice. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas, Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Research Series No. 233.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol. 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Shaw, W. C. 1966. Weeds and their control in rice production. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 292. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Street, J. E. 1987. Fenoxaprop for postemergence barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 35:224–227.Google Scholar
Stauber, L. G., Nastasi, P., Smith, R. J. Jr., Baltazar, A. M., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 5:337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. E. and Snipes, C. E. 1987. Susceptibility of rice (Oryza sativa) to various postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 35:686–690.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. 1984. Toxicity and translocation of sethoxydim in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) as affected by environment. Weed Sci. 32:20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, H. S., Caldwell, B. C., Hsiao, A. I., Quick, W. A., and Chao, J. F. 1995. Spray deposition of fenoxaprop and imazamethabenz on wild oat (Avena fatua) as influenced by environmental factors. Weed Sci. 43:179–183.Google Scholar
Xie, H. S., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1994. Effect of shading on activity of imazamethabenz and fenoxaprop in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 42:66–69.Google Scholar