Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:59:53.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Response of Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), Annual Grasses, and Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis) to Imazapic and Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sandra L. Shinn  and
Donald C. Thill
Sandra L. Shinn*
Affiliation:
Syngenta Crop Protection, 67 Pinewood Road, Hudson, NY 12534
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competition from annual grasses and yellow starthistle can severely reduce perennial grass forage production and quality in pasture and rangeland. The purpose of this study was to determine yellow starthistle and weedy annual grass control by imazapic applied alone or in combination with picloram, and smooth brome tolerance to these treatments. Sixty days after treatment (DAT) imazapic applied at 70 and 140 g ae/ha reduced annual grass (downy brome, medusahead, and annual bluegrass) plant density and biomass by 66 to 76% compared with the untreated control. Picloram applied at 280 and 420 g ae/ha reduced yellow starthistle plant density and biomass by over 93%. Imazapic applied at 70 and 140 g/ha reduced smooth brome biomass by 79 to 95% at 60 DAT. Picloram did not affect the density or the biomass of annual grasses or smooth brome, whereas imazapic did not markedly affect the density or the biomass of yellow starthistle. Downy brome control increased to a maximum of 97% with increasing imazapic dose (maximum of 280 g/ha) at 30, 60, and 90 DAT.

Keywords

Ammonium salt of imazapicpotassium salt of picloramannual bluegrass, Poa annua L. #3 POAANdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEmedusahead, Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski. # ELYCMsmooth brome, Bromus inermis Leyss. # BROINyellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. # CENSOHerbicide toleranceDAT, days after treatmentOM, organic matterPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 366 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beran, D. D., Vollmer, J. G., and Vollmer, J. L. 2001. Invasive weed management and rangeland improvement with imazapic. Coeur d'Alene, ID: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Proc. p. 56.Google Scholar
Evans, R. A. 1961. Effects of different densities of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) on growth and survival of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum) in the greenhouse. Weed Sci. 9: 216–223.Google Scholar
Harris, G. A. 1967. Some competitive relationships between Agropyron desertorum and Bromus tectorum . Ecol. Monogr. 37: 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. E., Barnes, R. F., and Metcalfe, D. S. 1985. Forages: the science of grassland agriculture. In Buckner, R. C., ed. The Fescues. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. pp. 233–240.Google Scholar
Hull, A. C. Jr. 1963. Competition and water requirements of cheatgrass and wheatgrass in the greenhouse. J. Range Manag. 16: 199–203.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. S., Sheley, R. S., and Carter, J. R. 2000. Picloram, fertilizer, and defoliation interactions on spotted knapweed re-invasion. J. Range Manag. 53: 309–314.Google Scholar
Larson, L. L. and McInnis, M. L. 1988. Response of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and grass biomass to grass, picloram, and fertilizer combinations. Weed Technol. 3: 497–500.Google Scholar
Lass, L. W., McCaffrey, J. P., Thill, D. C., and Callihan, R. H. 1999. Yellow Starthistle. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Extension Bull. 805. pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. 1985. Evaluation of AC 263,222 for Leafy Spurge Control. Phoenix, AZ: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. 16 p.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W., Shinn, S. L., and Thill, D. C. 1998. Response of Yellow Starthistle to Several Herbicides. Kona, HI: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. 19 p.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., Toney, J. C., Bedunah, D. J., and Carlson, C. E. 1997. Plant community diversity and growth form responses to herbicide applications for control of Centaurea maculosa . J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 1397–1412.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 582 p.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Duncan, C. A., Halstvedt, M. B., and Jacobs, J. S. 2000. Spotted knapweed and grass response to herbicide treatments. J. Range Manag. 53: 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, S. L. 2001. Response of Yellow Starthistle, Meadow Hawkweed, Spotted Knapweed and Annual and Perennial Grass to Imazapic. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. pp. 8–47.Google Scholar
Vollmer, J. L. and Vollmer, J. G. 2001. Use of imazapic for control and restoration of bromus infested areas. Coeur d'Alene, ID: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Proc. p. 55.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Burrill, L. C., Dewey, S. A., Cudney, D. W., Nelson, B. E., Lee, R. D., and Parker, R. 1991. Weeds of the West. Jackson, WY: Pioneer of Jackson Hole. pp. 480–481.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Clements, C. D., and Nader, G. 1999. Medusahead and clay: the rarity of perennial seedling establishment. Rangeland 6: 19–23.Google Scholar