Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:33:34.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Seven Weed Species to Corn Gluten Meal and White Mustard (Sinapis alba) Seed Meal Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jialin Yu  and
Don W. Morishita
Jialin Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, Kimberly Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Kimberly, ID, 83841
Don W. Morishita*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, Kimberly Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Kimberly, ID, 83841
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corn gluten meal (CGM) and white mustard seed meal (MSM) can release biologically active allelochemicals and have been demonstrated to be useful as PRE alternative weed control products. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of CGM and MSM on the emergence and aboveground dry weight of five broadleaf and two grass weed species. Greenhouse experiments were conducted using 26 by 53 cm plastic trays filled with a mix of field soil and potting soil (4 : 1 by wt). CGM and MSM were mixed with 1.5 kg of soil mix and applied at rates equivalent to 2,240, 4,480, and 6,720 kg ha−1. Overall, MSM was more effective than CGM for controlling weeds. Averaged over application rates and compared to the nontreated control, emergence rates were 17, 27, and 34% for kochia, common lambsquarters, and barnyardgrass, respectively, in CGM-amended soil, and 14, 13, and 6% for kochia, common lambsquarters, and barnyardgrass, respectively, in MSM-amended soil. Averaged over application rates, green foxtail and common lambsquarters aboveground dry biomass were 40 and 25% of the nontreated control, respectively, in CGM-amended soil. Green foxtail and common lambsquarters shoot biomass in MSM-amended soil was 13 and 5% of the nontreated control, respectively. Significant interactions were observed for meal by rate on redroot pigweed seedling emergence and redroot pigweed, barnyardgrass (Moscow), and annual sowthistle (Moscow) aboveground dry biomass. These interactions can be attributed to the fact that herbicidal effects were less evident in response to higher application rates using MSM compared to higher CGM application rates. Overall, this greenhouse study indicates MSM is more effective than or at least equal to CGM for broadleaf and grass weed control at the same application rate.

La harina de gluten de maíz (CGM) y la harina de semilla de mostaza (MSM) pueden liberar aleloquímicos biológicamente activos y se ha demostrado su utilidad como productos alternativos para el control de malezas en preemergencia (PRE). El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los efectos de CGM y MSM sobre la emergencia y peso seco de tejido aéreo de cinco especies de malezas de hoja ancha y dos gramíneas. Se realizaron experimentos de invernadero usando bandejas plásticas de 26 por 53 cm llenas de una mezcla de suelo de campo y suelo para macetas (4:1 en peso). CGM y MSM fueron mezclados con 1.5 kg de mezcla de suelo y aplicados a dosis equivalentes a 2,240, 4,480, y 6,720 kg ha−1. En general, MSM fue más efectivo que CGM para el control de malezas. Al promediarse todas las dosis de aplicación y al compararse con el testigo sin tratamiento, las tasas de emergencia fueron 17, 27, y 34% para Kochia scoparia, Chenopodium album, y Echinochloa crus-galli, respectivamente, en suelos enmendados con CGM, y 14, 13, y 6% para K. scoparia, C. album, y E. crus-galli, respectivamente, en suelos enmendados con MSM. Al promediarse todas las dosis de aplicación, la biomasa seca del tejido aéreo de Setaria viridis y C. album fue 40 y 25% en comparación con el testigo sin tratamiento, respectivamente, en suelo enmendado con CGM. La biomasa del tejido aéreo de S. viridis y C. album en suelo enmendado con MSM fue 13 y 5% en comparación con el testigo, respectivamente. Se observaron interacciones significativas entre el tipo de harina y la dosis en la emergencia de plántulas de Amaranthus retroflexus, y en la biomasa seca de A. retroflexus, E. crus-galli (Moscow), y Sonchus oleraceus (Moscow). Estas interacciones pueden ser atribuidas al hecho de que los efectos herbicidas fueron menos evidentes en respuesta a las dosis más altas de aplicación de MSM al compararse con las dosis más altas de CGM. En general, estos estudios de invernadero indican que MSM es más efectivo o al menos igual de efectivo que CGM para el control de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas a la misma dosis de aplicación.

Keywords

Annual sowthistle, Sonchus oleraceus L.barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauvcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauvkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schradredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L.Russian-thistle, Salsola tragus L.corn, Zea mays L.white mustard, Sinapis alba L. ‘IdaGold’Bioherbicidescorn gluten mealmustard seed mealorganic weed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 259 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223

References

Literature Cited

Abouziena, HFH, Omar, AAM, Sharma, SD, Singh, S (2009) Efficacy comparison of some new natural-product herbicides for weed control at two growth stages. Weed Technol 23:431–437 Google Scholar
Beekhuis, HA (1975) Technology and industrial applications. Pages 222–255 in Newman, AA, ed. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Thiocyanic Acid and its Derivatives. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bingaman, BR, Christians, NE (1995) Greenhouse screening of corn gluten meal as a natural control product for broadleaf and grass weeds. HortScience 30:1256–1259 Google Scholar
Borek, V, Morra, MJ (2005) Ionic thiocyanate production from 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate contained in Sinapis alba seed meal. J Agric Food Chem 53:8650–8654 Google Scholar
Borek, V, McCaffrey, J, Brown, P, Morra, M (1995) Transformation of the glucosinolate-derived allelochemicals allyl isothiocyanate and allylnitrile in soil. J Agric Food Chem 43:1935–1940 Google Scholar
Boydston, RA, Vaughn, SF, Anderson, T (2008) Mustard (Sinapis alba) seed meal suppresses weeds in container-grown ornamentals. HortScience 43:800–803 Google Scholar
Brown, PD, Morra, MJ (1996) Hydrolysis products of glucosinolates in Brassica napus tissues as inhibitors of seed germination. Plant Soil 181:307–316 Google Scholar
Brown, PD, Morra, MJ, McCaffrey, JP, Auld, DL, Williams, L (1991) Allelochemicals produced during glucosinolate degradation in soil. J Chem Ecol 17:2021–2034 Google Scholar
Cardellina, JH (1988) Natural products in the search for new agrochemicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 380:305–317 Google Scholar
Christians, NE (1993) The use of corn gluten meal as a natural preemergence weed control in turf. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 7:284–290 Google Scholar
Christians, NE, Garbutt, JT, Liu, D, inventors, assignees (1994) Preemergence weed control using plant protein hydrolysate. U.S. Patent No. 5,290,749 Google Scholar
Christians, NE, Liu, DL (1996) Bioactivity of a pentapeptide isolated from corn gluten hydrolysate on Lolium perenne L. J. Plant Growth Regul 15:13–17 Google Scholar
Fenwick, GR, Heaney, RK, Mullin, WJ (1983) Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 18:123–201 Google Scholar
Handiseni, M, Brown, J, Zemetra, R, Mazzola, M (2011) Herbicidal activity of Brassicaceae seed meal on wild oat (Avena fatua), Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), and prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol 25:127–134 Google Scholar
Hansson, D, Morra, MJ, Borek, V, Snyder, AJ, Johnson-Maynard, J, Thill, DC (2008) Ionic thiocyanate (SCN−) production, fate, and phytotoxicity in soil amended with Brassicaceae seed meals. J Agric Food Chem 56:3912–3917 Google Scholar
Haramoto, ER, Gallandt, ER (2005) Brassica cover cropping. I. Effects on weed and crop establishment. Weed Sci 53:695–701 Google Scholar
Ju, HY, Chong, C, Bible, BB (1983) Influence of ionic thiocyanate on growth of cabbage, bean, and tobacco. J Chem Ecol 9:1255–1262 Google Scholar
Liebman, M, Ohno, T (1998) Crop rotation and legume residue effects on weed emergence and growth: applications for weed management. Pages 181–221 in Hatfield, JL, Buhler, DD, Stewart, BA, eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
Liu, DLY, Christians, NE (1994) Isolation and identification of root-inhibiting compounds from corn gluten hydrolysate. J Plant Growth Regul 13:227–230 Google Scholar
McDade, MC (1999) Corn gluten meal and corn gluten hydrolysate for weed control. http://www.hort.iastate.edu/gluten/mcdade.html. Accessed March 28, 2011.Google Scholar
Molisch, H (1937) Der einfluss einer pflanze auf die andere: allelopathie. Page 303 in Radosevich, RS, Holt, JS, Ghersa, C, eds. Weed Ecology. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons Google Scholar
Nonnecke, GR, Christians, NE (1993) Evaluation of corn gluten meal as a natural weed control product in strawberry. Acta Hort 348:315–320 Google Scholar
Ohno, T, Doolan, K, Liebman, M, Zibilske, LM, Gallandt, ER, Berube, C (2000) Phytotoxic effects of red clover amended soils on wild mustard seedling growth. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:187–192 Google Scholar
Rice, A, Morra, MJ, Thill, D, Johnson-Maynard, J (2007) Vegetable crop emergence and weed control following amendment with different Brassicaceae seed meals. Renew Agric Food Syst 22:204–212 Google Scholar
Russo, VM, Webber, CL III (2012) Peanut pod, seed, and oil yield for biofuels following conventional and organic production systems. Ind Crop Prod 39:113–119 Google Scholar
Sang, JP, Truscott, PJW, Johnstone, PK, Minchinton, IR (1984) Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root and leaf tissue of cabbage, mustard, rapeseed, radish and swede. Can J Plant Sci 64:77–93 Google Scholar
Snyder, A, Morra, MJ, Johnson-Maynard, J, Thill, DC (2009) Seed meals from Brassicaceae oilseed crops as soil amendments: influence on carrot growth, microbial biomass nirtogen, and nitrogen mineralization. HortScience 44:354–361 Google Scholar
Unruh, JB, Christians, NE, Horner, HT (1997) Herbicidal effects of the dipeptide alaninyl-alanine on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) seedlings. Crop Sci 37:208–212 Google Scholar
Vaughn, SF, Boydston, RA (1997) Volatile allelochemicals released by crucifer green manures. J Chem Ecol 23:2107–2116 Google Scholar
Vaughn, SF, Palmquist, DE, Duval, SM, Berhow, MA (2006) Herbicidal acitivity of glocosinolate-containing seedmeals. Weed Sci 54:743–748 Google Scholar
Warton, B, Shackleton, MA, Matthiessen, JN (2001) Glucosinolate content and isothiocyanate evolution: two measures of the biofumigation potential of plants. J Agric Food Chem 49:5244–5250 Google Scholar
Webber, CL III, Shrefler, JW, Taylor, MJ (2007) Corn gluten meal as an alternative weed control option for spring-transplanted onions. Int J Veg Sci 13:17–33 Google Scholar