Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:18:58.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Northeastern Arkansas Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri) Accessions to Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Robert C. Scott ,
Kenneth L. Smith  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Kenneth L. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palmer amaranth accessions were collected from 21 fields in northeastern Arkansas in the fall of 2006 to determine if they differed in response to increasing doses of glyphosate and to determine the survival frequency following treatment with the label rate (870 g ae/ha). The herbicide dose required to kill 50% of individuals in an accession (LD50) ranged from 41 to 339 g/ha glyphosate, with most accessions responding similarly to glyphosate. The AR18 and AR19 were the least-sensitive accessions, with LD50 rates of 312 and 339 g/ha glyphosate, respectively. The mean survival frequency was 2.2% across all accessions when 870 g/ha glyphosate was applied to five- to seven-leaf plants. Sixteen of the accessions had at least one plant survive glyphosate at 870 g/ha. AR18 and AR19 accessions had a survival frequency of 6.3 and 11.8%, respectively. Following an additional cycle of selection with glyphosate, 44.3% of the progeny from the AR19 accession survived glyphosate at 870 g/ha, and its LD50 value significantly increased to 646 g/ha glyphosate. This research shows that there is a low percentage of Palmer amaranth plants currently present in production fields throughout northeastern Arkansas that are capable of surviving a single glyphosate application at the labeled rate and that further selection with glyphosate can increase the frequency of survival.

Keywords

GlyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPAGlyphosate resistanceherbicide resistanceherbicide toleranceselection for resistanceweed
Type
Weed Management — Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 408 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boerboom, C. M., Ehike, N. J., Wyse, D. L., and Somers, D. A. 1991. Recurrent selection for glyphosate tolerance in birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci. 31:1124–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J. A., Oliver, L. R., and Stephenson, D. O. IV. 2006. Response of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen, and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol. 20:885–892.Google Scholar
Burgos, N. R., Norsworthy, J. K., Scott, R. C., and Smith, K. L. 2008. Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after five years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 22:200–208.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., and Hanna, W. W. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. N., Gressel, J., and Mangel, M. 1998. A revolving dose strategy to delay the evolution of both quantitative vs. major monogene resistance to pesticides and drugs. J. Pest Manag. 44:161–180.Google Scholar
Garvey, P. V. 1999. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in plasticulture tomato. Ph.D dissertation. Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. 101.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2007. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: June 11, 2007.Google Scholar
Jha, P., Norsworthy, J. K., Malik, M. S., Bangarwa, S. K., and Oliveira, M. J. 2006. Temporal emergence of Palmer amaranth from a natural seedbank. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:177.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1994. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523–527.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., and Reddy, K. N. 2004. Effect of glyphosate spray coverage on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa). Weed Technol. 18:124–130.Google Scholar
Neve, P. and Powles, S. 2005a. High survival frequencies at low herbicide use rates in populations of Lolium rigidum result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance. Heredity. 95:485–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neve, P. and Powles, S. 2005b. Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum . Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:1154–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Griffith, G. M., Scott, R. C., Smith, K. L., and Oliver, L. R. 2008a. Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 21:108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Oliveira, M. J., Jha, P., Malik, M., Buckelew, J. K., Jennings, K. M., and Monks, D. W. 2008b. Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass growth with plasticulture-grown Capsicum annuum . Weed Technol. 22:296–302.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Oliver, L. R., and Purcell, L. C. 1999. Diurnal leaf movement effects on spray interception and glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol. 13:466–470.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Smith, K. L., Scott, R. C., and Gbur, E. E. 2007. Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas cotton. Weed Technol. 21:825–831.Google Scholar
Rowland, M. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1999. Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 47:305–309.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Steckel, L. E., Smith, K. L., Mueller, S., Oliver, L. R., and Norsworthy, J. K. 2007. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in Tennessee and Arkansas. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 60:226.Google Scholar
Smith, D. A. and Hallett, S. G. 2006. Variable response of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations and individuals to glyphosate. Weed Technol. 20:466–471.Google Scholar
Smith, D. T., Baker, R. V., and Steele, G. L. 2000. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 14:122–126.Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, L. M., Webster, T. M., Kichler, J. M., MacRae, A. W., and Culpepper, A. S. 2007. An estimation of pollen flight time and dispersal distance for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:229.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weed Sci. 45:337–342.Google Scholar
Volenberg, D. S., Patzoldt, W. L., Hager, A. G., and Tranel, P. J. 2007. Responses of contemporary and historical waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) accessions to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 55:327–333.Google Scholar
Wise, A. M., Grey, T. L., Prostko, E. P., and Vencill, W. K. 2007. ALS resistant Amaranthus palmeri in Georgia: distribution, dose response, and heritability. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:71.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Whitaker, J. R., Culpepper, A. S., and Main, C. L. 2007. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the southeastern United States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:225.Google Scholar