Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:11:48.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) to Trimethylsulfonium and Isopropylamine Salts of Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald F. Krausz  and
Bryan G. Young
Ronald F. Krausz*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1998 to 2000 to evaluate the effects of the trimethylsulfonium (Tms) salt of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant soybean at Belleville, IL. Glyphosate-Tms and glyphosate-isopropylamine (Ipa) at 1,120, 1,680, 2,240, 3,360, and 4,480 g ai/ha were applied at the V4 and R1 growth stages of glyphosate-resistant soybean. Glyphosate-Tms and glyphosate-Ipa caused greater chlorosis when applied at the R1 growth stage when compared with the V4 growth stage, and chlorosis increased with rate. Chlorosis ranged from 0 to 20% depending on the year. In 1998, glyphosate-Ipa at 2,240 and 3,360 g/ha applied at the R1 growth stage caused 4 to 5% more chlorosis than glyphosate-Tms at the same rates. In addition to chlorosis, glyphosate-Tms caused bleaching (white speckling) of soybean leaves, with bleaching increasing as glyphosate-Tms rate increased. Glyphosate-Ipa caused no bleaching, regardless of rate. Glyphosate-Tms and -Ipa caused no visible height reduction at 14 and 28 d after treatment in any year. In 1998 and 1999, glyphosate-Tms and -Ipa, at the highest rate applied at the R1 growth stage, increased days to maturity of soybean. Despite the injury and delay in maturity caused by glyphosate-Tms and -Ipa, there was no difference in grain yield across years because of glyphosate salt, rate, or application timing.

Keywords

Glyphosatesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Pioneer 94B01 RR’Herbicide injury, postemergence, transgenic soybeanDAT, days after treatmentEPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthaseIpa, isopropylamineTms, trimethylsulfonium
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 745 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., and Steinrucken, H. C. 1980. The site of the inhibition of the shikimate pathway by glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 66: 830–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 642–647.Google Scholar
Carlson, K. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Comparative phytotoxicity of glyphosate, SC-0024, SC-0545, and HOE-00661. Weed Sci. 32: 841–844.Google Scholar
Cooley, W. E. and Foy, C. L. 1986. Effects of SC-0224 and glyphosate on inflated duckweed (Lemna gibba) growth and EPSP-synthase activity from Klebsiella pneumoniae . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 26: 365–374.Google Scholar
Cooley, W. E. and Foy, C. L. 1992. Effects of SC-0024 and glyphosate on free amino acids, soluble protein synthesis in inflated duckweed (Lemna gibba). Weed Sci. 40: 345–350.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. A. and Harvey, R. G. 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 569–577.Google Scholar
Darwent, A. L., Kirkland, K. J., Baig, M. N., and Lefkovitch, L. P. 1994. Preharvest applications of glyphosate for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Technol. 8: 477–482.Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1,461–1,467.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 354–360.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1993. Weed control and yield are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technol. 7: 443–451.Google Scholar
Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1985. Herbicide evaluations for no-till soybean (Glycine max) production in corn (Zea mays) residue. Weed Sci. 33: 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, C. M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1990. Reducing herbicide inputs when establishing no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4: 14–19.Google Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Kolacz, K. H., Delannay, X., et al. 1995. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 35: 1,451–1,461.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. L., Gaines, C. G., and Jensen, R. A. 1982. Enzymological basis for the herbicidal action of glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 70: 833–839.Google Scholar
Salisbury, C. D., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1991. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of glyphosate and SC-0224 control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 5: 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satchivi, N. M., Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., Briskin, D. P. 2000. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate isopropylamine and trimethylsulfonium salts in Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi . Weed Sci. 48: 675–679.Google Scholar
Smutny, E. J., Soloway, S. B., Dowding, L. C., and Van Overbeek, J. 1963. Method for preventing undesired plant growth. US Patent Office, Pat. No. 3,101,265. pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 478–483.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Bryant, K. J., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 586–593.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33: 531–536.Google Scholar