Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:02:29.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Drought-Stressed Grafted and Nongrafted Tomato to Postemergence Metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2017

Sushila Chaudhari ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks ,
David L. Jordan ,
Christopher C. Gunter  and
Frank J. Louws
Sushila Chaudhari*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Assistant Professor, Associate Director of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Assistant Professor, Associate Director of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Assistant Professor, Associate Director of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
William Neal Reynolds Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Christopher C. Gunter
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Assistant Professor, Associate Director of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Frank J. Louws
Affiliation:
Professor in the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology and Director of the National Science Foundation Center for Integrated Pest Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tomato grafting is practiced worldwide as an innovative approach to manage stress from drought, waterlogging, insects, and diseases. Metribuzin is a commonly used herbicide in tomato but has potential to cause injury after application if plants are under stress. The influence of metribuzin on grafted tomato under drought-stress has not been studied. Greenhouse experiments were conducted in Raleigh, NC to determine the tolerance of drought-stressed grafted and non-grafted tomato to metribuzin. The tomato cultivar ‘Amelia’ was used as the scion in grafted tomato, and for the non-grafted control. Two hybrid tomato ‘Beaufort’ and ‘Maxifort’ were used as rootstocks for grafted plants. Drought-stress treatments included: no drought-stress; 3 d of drought-stress before metribuzin application with no drought-stress after application (3 d DSB); and 3 d of drought-stress before metribuzin application with 3 d of drought-stress after application (3 d DSBA). Metribuzin was applied at 550 g ai ha−1. No difference in injury from metribuzin was observed in grafted and non-grafted plants. However, at 7 and 14 d after metribuzin treatment (DMT), less injury was observed on tomato in the 3 d DSBA treatment (5 and 2% injury, respectively) than on plants in the 3 d DSB treatment (15 and 8% injury, respectively) or those that were never drought-stressed (18 and 11% injury, respectively). Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance measured prior to metribuzin application were reduced similarly in grafted and non-grafted tomato subjected to drought-stress. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of grafted and non-grafted tomato at 7 DMT was not different among drought-stress treatments or metribuzin treatments. Grafted and non-grafted tomato plants under drought-stress exhibit similar tolerance to metribuzin. The risk of metribuzin injury to grafted tomato under drought-stress is similar to non-grafted tomato.

Keywords

Metribuzintomato, Solanum lycopersicum L.Graftingphotosynthesisrootstockstomatal conductance
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 447 - 454
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Steve Fennimore, University of California, Davis.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2009) TriCor 75 DF herbicide label. King of Prussia, PA: United Phosphorus, Inc. 19 pGoogle Scholar
Barrett, CE, Zhao, X, McSorley, R (2012) Grafting for root-knot nematode control and yield improvement in organic heirloom tomato production. HortScience 47:614–620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, RA (1990) Soil water content affects the activity of four herbicides on green foxtail. Weed Sci 38:578–582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brix, H (1962) The effect of water stress on the rates of photosynthesis and respiration in tomato pants and loblolly pine seedlings. Physiol Plant 15:10–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Jordan, DL, Gunter, CC, Louws, FJ (2015) Response of grafted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to herbicides. Weed Technol 29:800–809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colla, G, Suãrez, CMC, Cardarelli, M, Rouphael, Y (2010) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by grafting. HortScience 45:559–565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djidonou, D, Zhao, X, Simonne, EH, Koch, KE, Erickson, JE (2013) Yield, water-, and nitrogen-use efficiency in field-grown, grafted tomatoes. HortScience 48:485–492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortino, JJ, Splittstoesser, WE (1974a) Response of tomato to metribuzin. Weed Sci 22:460–463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortino, JJ, Splittstoesser, WE (1974b) The use of metribuzin for weed control in tomato. Weed Sci 22:615–619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd edn. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Frear, DS, Mansager, ER, Swanson, HR, Tanaka, FS (1983) Metribuzin metabolism in tomato: isolation and identification of N-glucoside conjugates. Pesti Biochem Physiol 19:270–281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, GH, Hamill, AS (1978) Influence of sunlight on metribuzin injury to transplanted tomatoes. Can J Plant Sci 58:1115–1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, SW (1983) Tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 31:525–527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, C, McClure, MA, Kokalis-Burelle, N, Bausher, MG, Rosskopf, EN (2008) Vegetable grafting: history, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43:1664–1669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JM, Kubota, C, Tsao, SJ, Bie, Z, Hoyos Echevarria, P, Morra, L, Oda, M (2010) Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci Hort 127:93–105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louws, FJ, Rivard, CL, Kubota, C (2010) Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds. Sci Hort 127:127–146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAvoy, T, Freeman, JH, Rideout, SL, Olson, SM, Paret, ML (2012) Evaluation of grafting using hybrid rootstocks for management of bacterial wilt in field tomato production. HortScience 47:621–625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, KE (2013) Cumulative Herbicide Stress on Processing Tomato (Solanum lycopersicm L.) (Ph.D dissertation. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph. 106 pGoogle Scholar
Morrison, RG, Lownds, NK, Sterling, TM (1995) Picloram uptake, translocation, and efficacy in relation to water status of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens). Weed Sci 43:34–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, TT, Fuentes, S, Marschner, P (2012) Effects of compost on water availability and gas exchange in tomato during drought and recovery. Plant Soil Environ 58:495–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregoy, R, Kitchen, L, Jordan, P, Griffin, J (1990) Moisture stress effects on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of haloxyfop in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis). Weed Sci 38:331–337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phatak, SC, Stephenson, GR (1973) Influence of light and temperature on metribuzin phytotoxicity to tomato. Can J plant Sci 53:843–847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proietti, S, Rouphael, Y, Colla, G, Cardarelli, M, De Agazio, M, Zacchini, M, Rea, E, Moscatello, S, Battistelli, A (2008) Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. J Sci Food Agr 88:1107–1114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, NKS, Bhatt, RM, Sadashiwa, AT (2000) Tolerance to water stress in tomato cultivars. Photosynthetica 38:465–467 Google Scholar
Rivard, CL, Louws, FJ (2006) Grafting for Disease Resistance in Heirloom Tomatoes. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin Ag–675. 8 ppGoogle Scholar
Rivard, CL, O’Connell, S, Peet, MM, Louws, FJ (2010) Grafting tomato with interspecific rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematode. Plant Dis 94:1015–1021 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivard, CL, O’Connell, S, Peet, MM, Welker, RM, Louws, FJ (2012) Grafting tomato to manage bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis 96:973–978 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivard, CL, Olha, S, O’Connell, S, Peet, MM, Louws, FJ (2010) An economic analysis of two grafted tomato transplant production systems in the United States. HortTechnology 20:794–803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, Y, Ohara, T, Sugiyama, M (2007) The history and present state of the grafting of cucurbitaceous vegetables in Japan. Acta Hort 731:159–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, D, Rouphael, Y, Colla, G, Venema, JH (2010) Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Scientia Horticulturae 127:162–171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senseman, SA (2007) Herbicide Handbook. 9th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Stephenson, GR, McLeod, JE, Phatak, SC (1976) Differential tolerance of tomato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 24:161–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldecker, M, Wyse, D (1985) Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption and translocation in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci 33:299–305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J, Tao, B, Messersmith, CG, Nalewaja, JD (2007) Glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) is affected by stress. Weed Sci 55:240–244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar